Breeding indices of spring wheat varieties

С. О. Хоменко, В. С. Кочмарський, І. В. Федоренко, М. В. Федоренко, Т. М. Хоменко

Abstract


Purpose. To establish the most effective index figures for determination of breeding value of spring wheat genotypes.

Methods. Field and statistical ones. Index of prospectivity – IP, Finno-Scandinavian index – FSI, Mexican index – MI, Bila Tserkva index – BI, Poltava index – PI, index of spike linear density – ISLD, index of spike density – ISD were defined.

Results. During the investigation period, weather conditions differed from the long-term average annual indices for temperature regime, amount of precipitation and its distribution by month. Conditions of the growing season was the most favorable in 2016 (HTC = 1.1), insufficient level of humidity was specific for 2017 (HTC = 0.2). This allowed to define breeding indices for the soft wheat and spring durum wheat growing under different conditions. The analysis of the obtained data showed that the IP varied both in varieties and over the years, that indicated a various response of genotypes to vegetation conditions that existed during the growing years. Varieties of durum wheat ‘Slavuta’ and soft spring wheat ‘Struna myronivska’ were characterized by the high FSI. Such durum wheat varieties as ‘MIP Magdalena’, ‘MIP Raiduzhna’, ‘Kuchumivka’, ‘Kharkivska 41’, as well as the following soft spring varieties as ‘MIP Zlata’, ‘Oksamyt myronivskyi’, ‘Struna myronivska’, ‘Elehiya myronivska’ had a high level of MI. The spring wheat varieties have the highest indices of LSD and BI in 2016. IP during the investigation period was ranging from 2.3 to 4.5 in durum wheat varieties and from 2.2 to 6.4 in soft spring wheat. In breeding, it is important to use breeding indices, which should be included on the basis of traits that have a reliable correlation with yield index. SD indices (r = 0.53±0.08), BI (r = 0.42±0.08), MI (r = 0.41±0.08) were the most effective for durum spring wheat varieties in the year to be the best for humidification (2016), while PI (r = 0.39±0.07; r = 0.34±0.07 respectively) was the most effective for the soft wheat in 2016 and 2017. For the complex of breeding indices, the varieties of soft spring wheat (‘Struna myronivska’, ‘Simkoda myronivska’, ‘MIP Zlata’) and durum (MIP Mahdalena’, ‘MIP Raiduzhna’, ‘Slavuta’, ‘Kuchumivka’) were defined.

Conclusions. The indices SD, BI, MI were the most effective for durum spring wheat varieties and PI – for soft wheat. Selected spring wheat varieties showed the optimum ratio between investigated traits.


Keywords


spring wheat; breeding indices; correlation; varieties

References


Vasylkivskyi, S. P., & Kochmarskyi, V. S. (2016). Selektsiya i nasinnytstvo polovykh kultur [Breeding and seed production of field crops]. Myronivka: N.p. [in Ukrainian]

Fedin, M. A., Silis, D. Ya., & Smiryayev, A. V. (1976). Method of breeding indices. Selektsiya i semenovodstvo [Plant Breeding and Seed Production], 2, 53–59. [in Russian]

Szamák, I. (1979). Breeding of dwarf wheats by means of three indexes breaking correlations. Cereal Res. Commun., 7(3), 215–225.

Lozinska, T. P., & Vlasenko, V. A. (2010). The use of new breeding index for evaluation of the production process of soft wheat varieties. Vìsnik Sums’kogo nacìonal’nogo agrarnogo unìversitetu. Agronomìya ì bìologìya [Bulletin of Sumy National Agrarian University. Series: Agronomy and Biology], 10, 130–133. [in Ukrainian]

Tishchenko, V. N., & Chekalin, N. M. (2005). Geneticheskie osnovy adaptivnoy selektsii ozimoy pshenitsy v zone Lesostepi [Genetic Basis of Winter Wheat Adaptive Breeding in the Forest-Steppe Zone]. Poltava: N.p. [in Ukrainian]

Gulyaev, G. V., & Guzhov, Yu. L. (1987). Selektsiya i semenovodstvo polevykh kul’tur [Breeding and seed production of field crops]. (3rd ed., rev.). Moscow: Agropromizdat. [in Russian]

Selyaninov, G. T. (1937). Technique of agricultural characteristics of climate. In Mirovoy agroklimaticheskiy spravochnik [Global Agroclimatic Guide] (pp. 5–29). Leningrad–Moscow: Gidrometeoizdat. [in Russian]


GOST Style Citations


Васильківський С. П., Кочмарський В. С. Селекція і насінниц­тво польових культур. Миронівка : Миронівська друкарня, 2016. 376 с.

Федин М. А., Силис Д. Я., Смиряев А. В. Метод селекционных индексов. Селекция и семеноводство : респ. межвед. темат. науч. сб. Киев, 1976. Вып. 2. С. 53–59.

Szamák I. Breeding of dwarf wheats by means of three indexes brea­king correlations. Cereal Res. Commun. 1979. Vol. 7, No. 3. P. 215–225.

Лозінська Т. П., Власенко В. А. Використання нового селекційного індексу для оцінки продукційного процесу у сортів пшениці м’якої ярої. Вісн. Сумського нац. аграр. ун-ту. Сер.: Агрономія і біологія. 2010. Вип. 10. С. 130–133.

Тищенко В. Н., Чекалин Н. М. Генетические основы адаптивной селекции озимой пшеницы в зоне Лесостепи. Полтава, 2005. 271 с.

Гуляев Г. В., Гужов Ю. Л. Селекция и семеноводство полевых культур. 3-е изд., перераб. и доп. Москва : Агропромиздат, 1987. 447 с.

Селянинов Г. Т. Методика сельскохозяйственной характерис­тики климата. Мировой агроклиматический справочник. Ленинград–Москва : Гидрометеоиздат, 1937. С. 5–29.





DOI: https://doi.org/10.21498/2518-1017.13.4.2017.117738

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Flag Counter