Realization of soybean biological potential as affected by agronomical practices under the conditions of the Forest-Steppe of Ukraine

О. І. Присяжнюк, С. В. Григоренко, О. Ю. Половинчук

Abstract


Purpose. To identify the productivity formation peculiarities of certain soybean varieties as affected by organic fertilizer, plant growth regulators, and moisture retainer application under the conditions of the Forest-Steppe of Ukraine.

Methods. Soybean varieties ‘Ustia’, ‘Kano’, and ‘Hieba’ served as the object of the study. Moisture retainer ‘Aquasorb’ was introduced a month before sowing soybean in 10-cm strips in the zone of rows at the application rate of 300 kg/ha. Organic fertilizer ‘Parostok’ (mark 20) was applied twice: at the 3–5 leaf stage and at the 9–11 leaf stage. Growth regulators ‘Vermystym D’ and ‘Ahrostymulin’ were applied at the stage of budding at the recommended by producer dose.

Results. The formulations under investigation did not affect the duration of phenological stages, and development of soybean plants occurred in accordance with their varietal characteristics and weather conditions of the year. The vegetation period of the varieties under study ranged from 109 to 117 days, which was typical of a mid-ripe­ning soybean group. Pre-sowing introduction of the moisture retainer ‘Aquasorb’ provided an increase in the soil water storage. As of 20 May 2016, the soil water storage in the 0–20 cm soil layer was 42 mm, while in the treatment with a moisture retainer it was 46 mm; in 2017, the values were 31 and 36 mm, respectively. On average, the plant density (per 1 m2)in ‘Kano’ sowings was 60.6, in ‘Hieba’ 58.5 and in ‘Ustia’ 59.2. The moisture retainer ‘Aquasorb’A provided a significant influence on the plant density formation, while organic fertilizers and growth regulators had almost no effect. The minimum yield of soybean grain in the control treatment (no formulations applied) was as follows: 3.99 t/ha in ‘Kano’, 1.72 t/ha in ‘Hieba’, and 2.43 t/ha in ‘Ustia’. All investigated agronomical practices ensured a significant increase in grain yield. The maximum yield in the experiment (4.74 t/ha) was provided by ‘Kano’ variety in the treatment with the complex application of moisture retainer ‘Aquasorb’, organic fertilizer ‘Parostok’ and growth regulator ‘Vermystym D’. The content of crude protein in soybean seeds in the control treatment varied from 35.2 to 36.6%. Application of the moisture retainer did not have any significant effect on this indicator. Top dressing with fertilizer increased the content of crude protein by 0.2–0.7% in different varieties. The maximum content of crude protein was obtained in the treatment with combined application of organic fertilizer and plant growth regulators.

Conclusions. Integrated application of moisture retainer, organic fertilizer and plant growth regulators in soybean sowings is an important and effective factor in the realization of the crop yield potential. The quantitative and qualitative parameters of the crop productivity formation determined in the research can be used to improve the crop cultivation technology under the conditions of the Forest-Steppe of Ukraine.


Keywords


soybean; organic fertilizers; plant growth regulators; moisture retainer; grain yield and quality; weather conditions of the growing season; water availability of the soil

References


Zbyrannia vrozhaiu silskohospodarskykh kultur stanom na 1 zhovtnia 2017 roku [Harvesting of crops as of October 1, 2017]. (2017). Kyiv: State Statistics Service of Ukraine. URL: http://www.ukrstat.gov.ua/druk/publicat/kat_u/publ7_u.htm [in Ukrainian]

Moisiienko, V. V., & Didora, V. H. (2010). Agroeconomic substantiation of the role of soybean in solving the problem of vegetable protein in Ukraine. Vìsnik Žitomirsʹkogo nacìo­nalʹnogo agroekologìčnogo unìversitetu [Bulletin of Zhytomyr National Agroecological University], 1, 153–166. [in Ukrainian]

Dribotko, A. V. (2002). Formuvannia vrozhaiu zerna soi zalezhno vid pryiomiv vyroshchuvannia v umovakh Pivdenno-Zakhidnoho Stepu [Formation of soybean yield as affected by growing methods under the conditions of the South-Western Steppe of Ukraine] (Extended Abstract of Cand. Agric. Sci. Diss.). Institute of Agriculture of UAAS, Kyiv, Ukraine. [in Ukrainian]

Zabolotnyi, O. H. (2006). Problemy pidvyshchennia efektyvnosti vyrobnytstva soi i tekhnolohii yii pererobky [Problems of increasing the efficiency of soybean production and processing technology]. Vinnytsia: Knyha-Veha. [in Ukrainian]

Metodychni rekomendatsii tekhnolohii vyroshchuvannia soi v umovakh Rivnenshchyny [Methodical recommendations on soybean cultivation technology under the conditions of Rivne region]. (2011). Rivne: N.p. [in Ukrainian]

Mosondz, N. P. (2014). Formation of soybean productivity as affected by agronomical practices under the conditions of the northern part of the Forest-Steppe. Zemlerobstvo [Agriculture], 1–2, 74–78. [in Ukrainian]

Petrychenko, V. F., Babych, A. O., & Kolisnyk, S. I. (2005). Ways of increasing the productivity of soya in the conditions of the Forest-Steppe of Ukraine. Selekciâ i nasìnnictvo [Plant Breeding and Seed Production], 90, 50–58. [in Ukrainian]

Volkodav, V. V. (Ed.). (2000). Metodyka derzhavnoho sortovyp­robuvannia silskohospodarskykh kultur. Zahalna chastyna [Methods of state testing of crops. General part]. Kyiv: N.p. [in Ukrainian]

Tkachyk, S. O. (Ed.). (2015). Metodyka derzhavnoi naukovo-tekhnichnoi ekspertyzy sortiv roslyn. Metody vyznachennia pokaznykiv yakosti produktsii roslynnytstva [Methodology of state scientific and technical examination of plant varieties. Methods of determining the quality indices of crop production]. (4th ed., rev.). Vinnytsia: Nilan-LTD. [in Ukrainian]

Ermantraut, E. R., Prysiazhniuk, O. I., & Shevchenko, I. L. (2007). Statystychnyi analiz ahronomichnykh doslidnykh danykh v paketi STATISTICA 6.0 [Statistical analysis of agronomic study data in the Statistica 6.0 software suite]. Kyiv: PolihrafKonsaltynh. [in Ukrainian]


GOST Style Citations


Збирання врожаю сільськогосподарських культур станом на 1 жовтня 2017 р. : стат. бюл. Київ : Державна служба статистики, 2017. 44 с. URL: http://www.ukrstat.gov.ua/druk/publicat/kat_u/publ7_u.htm

Мойсієнко В. В., Дідора В. Г. Агроекономічне обґрунтування ролі сої у вирішенні проблеми рослинного білка в Україні. Вісник ЖНАЕУ. 2010. № 1. С. 153–166.

Дріботько А. В. Формування врожаю зерна сої залежно від прийомів вирощування в умовах Південно-Західного Степу України: автореф. дис. … канд. с.-г. наук : спец. 06.01.09 «Рослинництво» / Ін-т землеробства УААН. Київ, 2002. 20 с.

Заболотний О. Г. Проблеми підвищення ефективності виробництва сої і технології її переробки. Вінниця : Книга-Вега, 2006. 168 с.

Методичні рекомендації технології вирощування сої в умовах Рівненщини. Рівне, 2011. 34 с.

Мосьондз Н. П. Формування продуктивності сої залежно від технологічних заходів вирощування в умовах північної частини Лісостепу. Землеробство. 2014. Вип. 1–2. С. 74–78.

Петриченко В. Ф., Бабич А. О., Колісник С. І. Шляхи підвищення продуктивності сої в умовах Лісостепу України. Селекція і насінництво. 2005. Вип. 90. С. 50–58.

Методика державного сортовипробування сільськогосподарських культур. Загальна частина / за ред. В. В. Волкодава. Київ : Алефа, 2000. 100 c.

Методика державної науково-технічної експертизи сортів рослин. Методи визначення показників якості продукції рослинництва / за ред. С. О. Ткачик. 4-те вид., випр. і доп. Вінниця : Нілан-ЛТД, 2015. 160 с.

Ермантраут Е. Р., Присяжнюк О. І., Шевченко І. Л. Статистичний аналіз агрономічних дослідних даних в пакеті STATISTICA 6.0. Київ : ПоліграфКонсалтинг, 2007. 55 с.





DOI: https://doi.org/10.21498/2518-1017.14.2.2018.134773



Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

DOI: 10.21498/2518-1017

Flag Counter