Analysis of the phytosanitary state of crops of various soybean varieties in the conditions of the Southern Steppe of Ukraine

Authors

  • Г. О. Балан Odessa State Agrarian University, Ukraine https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0485-843X
  • С. О. Ткачик Ukrainian Institute for Plant Variety Examination, Ukraine https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2402-079X
  • Н. О. Орленко Ukrainian Institute for Plant Variety Examination, Ukraine
  • О. В. Бушулян Plant Breeding and Genetics Institute – National Center of Seed and Cultivars Investigation, Ukraine

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21498/2518-1017.14.3.2018.145300

Keywords:

soybean, phytosanitary condition of crops, fungal, bacterial and viral diseases, composition of pathogen species, immunological assessment of varieties

Abstract

Purpose. To analyze the phytosanitary state of soybean crops in the conditions of the Southern Steppe of Ukraine and to determine the most resistant cultivars to the complex of diseases for further use in breeding practice.

Methods. 35 soybean sorts of different origin from the collection of the Plant Breeding and Genetics Institute – National Center of Seed and Cultivar Study (NAAS) were under research. Resistance of soybean varieties to peronosporosis, phomopsis and ash rot was evaluated in the context of natural infectious process and to a fusariosis – on a provocative basis.

Results. The species composition of soybean pathogenic diseases was determined during the planting in the conditions of the Southern Steppe of Ukraine. During the vegetation period the development of sprout fusariosis and root rot, on adult plants in the flowering phase – perenospores, in the phase of beans ripening – ash rot, stems and beans burn and other diseases were observed. The most common in soybean agrocenosis were representatives of mycoflora: Fusarium sp., Pevonospora manskurica (Naum.) Syd., Macro­phomina phaseolina (Tassi.) Goid., Diaporthe phaseolorum (Cke. Et Ell) Sacc. var. sojae Wehm. It is worth to note that the specific composition of pathogens varied in dependence of soy cultivar. The varieties ‘Lambert’, ‘Yurivka’ and ‘Yuvileina’ were dominated with the infection of Fusarium spp., and also a large number of plants was infected by P. manskurica perenosporosis. ‘Chernovytska 8’ variety stood out with intense ash rot infestation. In the pathogenic complex ‘Apolon’, ‘Odesa 150’, ‘Yurivka’ and ‘L-2’ varieties the emergence of ash rot and phomapsis were marked. ‘Apolon’, ‘Ustia’ and ‘L-2’ varieties were diagnosed with phomopsis.

Conclusions. According to the analysis, the soybean varieties ‘Arkadiia Odeska’, ‘Chornobura’, ‘Yatran’, ‘Berehynia’, ‘Stepovychka’, ‘Znakhidka’, ‘Medeia’, ‘Mariana’, ‘Vasylkivska’, ‘Faeton’, ‘Selek­ta’ were characterized by the complex resistance to fusario­sis, peronosporosis, ash rot and phomopsis.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Г. О. Балан, Odessa State Agrarian University

Galyna Balan

С. О. Ткачик, Ukrainian Institute for Plant Variety Examination

Svitlana Tkachyk

Н. О. Орленко, Ukrainian Institute for Plant Variety Examination

Nataliia Orlenko

О. В. Бушулян, Plant Breeding and Genetics Institute – National Center of Seed and Cultivars Investigation

Bushulian, O. V.

References

Pospielova, H. D. (2015). Phytopathogenic species of soybean seeds. Vìsn. Poltav. derž. agrar. akad. [News of Poltava State Agrarian Academy], 1–2, 44–48. [in Ukrainian]

Lykhchvor, V. V., Bomba, M. I., & Dubkovetskyi, S. V. (1999). Dovidnyk z vyroshchuvannia zernovykh i zernobobovykh kultur [Handbook for growing cereals and legumes]. Lviv: Ukrainski tekhnolohii. [in Ukrainian]

Lisovyi, M. P. (Ed.). (1999). Dovidnyk iz zakhystu roslyn [Guide for plant protection]. Kyiv: Urozhai. [in Ukrainian]

Khokhryakov, M. K. (2003). Opredelitel’ bolezney rasteniy [The plant diseases identifier]. (3rd ed.). Saint-Petersburg; Moscow: Lan’. [in Russian]

Peresypkin, V. F. (2000). Silskohospodarska fitopatolohiia [Agricultural phytopathology]. Kyiv: Ahrarna osvita. [in Ukrainian]

Omeliuta, V. P. (Ed.). (1986). Oblik shkidnykiv i khvorob silskohos­podarskykh kultur [Pests and diseases of agricultural crops]. Kyiv: Urozhai. [in Ukrainian]

Petrenkova, V. P., Cherniaieva, I. M., & Markova, T. Yu. (2004). Nasinnieva infektsiia polovykh kultur [Seed infections of field crops]. Kharkiv: Mahda LTD. [in Ukrainian]

Tkachyk, S. O. (Ed.). Metodyka provedennia fitopatolohichnykh doslidzhen za shtuchnoho zarazhennia roslyn [Methods for phytopathological study with plant experimental infestation] (p. 7). Vinnytsia: FOP Korzun D. Yu. [in Ukrainian]

Leshchuk, N. V., Mazhuha, K. M., Orlenko, N. S., Starychenko, Ye. M., & Shkapenko, Ye. A. (2017). Comparative analysis of statistical software products for VCU qualifying examination of plant varieties. Plant Varieties Studying and Protection, 13(4), 429–435. doi: 10.21498/2518-1017.13.4.2017.117757

Published

2018-10-23

How to Cite

Балан, Г. О., Ткачик, С. О., Орленко, Н. О., & Бушулян, О. В. (2018). Analysis of the phytosanitary state of crops of various soybean varieties in the conditions of the Southern Steppe of Ukraine. Plant Varieties Studying and Protection, 14(3), 295–301. https://doi.org/10.21498/2518-1017.14.3.2018.145300

Issue

Section

PLANT PRODUCTION