DOI: https://doi.org/10.21498/2518-1017.15.3.2019.181090

Morphophysiological features of the formation of winter wheat productivity depending on the cultivation technology

Л. В. Худолій

Abstract


Purpose. Improve adaptive technologies for growing winter wheat, which will ensure the planned stem density and the productivity of the ear, what will allow forming the maximum yield with high grain quality.

Methods. Field, laboratory stu­dies, mathematical and statistical analysis.

Results. During 2011–2015 the process of forming the productivity of winter wheat ‘Benefis’ variety with various cultivation technologies was monitored. In particular, indicators of the stem density, the number of initiated flowers, spikelets and grains in the ear, their reduction according to the stages of organogenesis, the potential yield of winter wheat and the degree to which it is actually realized are given. It was revealed that such elements of cultivation technology as doses of fertilizers, plant protection system positively influenced the density of the productive stems from the IV to XII stages of organogenesis. The largest number of preserved stems (695 pcs./m2) before the XII stage was noted in the variant with the introduction of Р135К135N60(II)+N75(IV)+N45(VIII) against the background of precursor by-products and in the case of integrated protection.The implementation of productive stems under these conditions was 41.3% quantity of the loss of stems from the IV to XII stage of organogenesis ranged from 657–986 pcs./m2 depending on doses of fertilizers and a protection system. The number of flowers (grains) in the ear from the V to the XII stage changed depending on the nutritional conditions of the plants and enhanced with increasing doses of fertili­zers in the ear of both orders. By the number of flowers per spike, integrated protection had an advantage over the minimum. The largest number of flowers from stage V to IX was received for introducing P135K135N60(II) + N75 (IV) + N45 (VII) against the background of by-products of the predecessor and in the case of integrated protection.

Conclusions. It was found that in the conditions of the northern part of the Forest-Steppe of Ukraine on the dark gray podzolized soil, the highest productivity of winter wheat was obtained by intensive energy-saturated cultivation technology with the introduction of Р135К135N60(II)+75(IV)+45(VIII) on the background of by-products of the precursor system and in the case of integrated protection. This technology ensure yield of 6.56 t/ha of grade 1 grain of A quality Group


Keywords


winter wheat; fertilizers; stem; ear; flowers; grain; reduction; productivity; yield; quality

References


Kuperman, F. M. (1984). Morfofiziologiya rasteniy. Morfofiziolo­gicheskiy analiz etapov organogeneza razlichnykh zhiznennykh form pokrytosemennykh rasteniy [Plant morphophysiology. Morphophysiological analysis of organogenesis stages of various life forms of angiosperms]. (4th ed., rev.). Moscow: Vysshaya shkola. [in Russian]

Sayko, V. F. (1990). Biologicheskie osnovy formirovaniya produk­tivnosti ozimoy pshenitsy [Biological underpinnings of winter wheat productivity formation]. Moscow: Rosselkhozizdat. [in Russian]

Oliinyk, K. M., & Golodna, A. V. (2016). Morphological and physio­logical features of spring wheat productivity formation at joint growing with blue lupine. Naukovì dopovìdì NUBiP Ukraïni [Scientific reports NULES of Ukraine], 6. Retrieved from http://journals.nubip.edu.ua/index.php/Dopovidi/article/view/7548 [in Ukrainian]

Oliinyk, K. M., & Khudolii, L. V. (2013). Impact of cultivation technologies on formation of winter wheat productivity elements. Naukovij vìsnik NUBIP Ukraïni. Serìâ Agronomìâ [Scientific Herald of NULES of Ukraine. Series: Agronomy], 183, 61–67. [in Ukrainian]

Petr, J. (1971). Nektera hlediska tvorby vynosu obilovin. Sb UVti. Genet. Slechteni, 7(1), 1–12.

Gritsyuk, P. M. (2010). Prediction of grain production as a tool to ensure food security of the state. In Modelling and analysis of Safety and Risk in Complex Systems: Proc. of the Ninth Int. Sci. School (pp. 301–305). July 6–10, 2010, Saint-Petersburg, Russia. [in Russian]

Tein, B., Eremeev, V., Keres, I., Selge, A., & Luik, A. (2010). Effect of different plant production methods on yield and quality of winter wheat ‘Portal’ in 2009. In Research for Rural Research for Rural Development 2010: Annual 16th Int. Sci. Conf. Proc. (Vol. 1, P. 17–21). May 19–21, 2010, Latvia University of Agriculture, Jelgava, Latvia.

Fischer, R. A., Byerlee, D., & Edmeades, G. O. (2014). Crop yields and global food security: Will yield increase continue to feed the world? ACIAR Monograph No. 15 (pp. 52–59). Canberra : Australian Centre for International Agricultural Research.

Savitskiy, M. S., & Nikolaev, M. E. (1976). Struktura urozhaya zernovykh kul’tur [Grain crop structure]. Gorki: BSKhA. [in Russian]

Remeslo, V. N., & Sayko, V. F. (1981). Sortovaya agrotekhnika pshenitsy [Varietal agrotechnics of wheat]. Kyiv: Urozhai. [in Russian]

Foltyn, J., & Rostlins, I. (1985). Serial – arhitectonika porostu psenise. Uroda, 33(3), 106–107.

Denisenko, A. G., & Krut, V. M. (1986). Rabochaya tetrad’ agro­noma po intensivnym tekhnologiyam vozdelyvaniya ozimykh kul’tur [Agronomist’s workbook on intensive technologies of winter crops cultivation]. Kyiv: Urozhai. [in Russian]

Pshenytsia. Tekhnichni umovy: DSTU 3768:2010 [Wheat. Specifications: State Standard of Ukraine: 3768:2010]. (2010). Kyiv: Derzhspozhyvstandart Ukrainy. [in Ukrainian]

Kononiuk, L. M., Oliinyk, K. M., Davydiuk, H. V., Natalchuk, T. A., & Khudolii, L. V. (2012). Variety importance for winter wheat growing technology in the northern part of Forest-Steppe zone. Zbìrnik naukovih pracʹ NNC “Ìnstitut zemlerobstva NAAN” [Scientific Magazine of the NSC “Institute of Agriculture of NAAS”], 3–4, 64–70. [in Ukrainian]

Cherno, O. D. (2015). Physical and biochemical properties of the quality of winter wheat under long-term fertilization. Zemlerobstvo [Agriculture], 1, 98–102. [in Ukrainian]

Petrenko, V., Sheiko, T., Khudolii, L., & Bondar, V. (2018). Evaluation of three wheat species commonly used in organic cropping systems, considering selected technological parameters for ethanol production. Englineering for Rural Development: Proc. 17th Int. Sci. Conf. (Vol. 17, pp. 451–455). May 23–25, 2018, Latvia University of Agriculture, Jelgava, Latvia. doi: 10.22616/ERDev2018.17.N030

Petrenk, V., Spychaj, R., Prysiazhniuk, O., Sheiko, T., & Khudolii, L. (2018). Evaluation of three wheat species (Triticum aestivum L., T. spelta L., T. dicoccum (Schrank) Schuebl) commonly used in organic cropping systems, considering selected parameters of technological quality. Rom. Agric. Res., 35, 255–264.


GOST Style Citations


Куперман Ф. М. Морфофизиология растений. Морфофизиологический анализ этапов органогенеза различных жизненных форм покрытосеменных растений. 4-е изд., перераб. и доп. Москва : Высшая школа, 1984. 240 с.

Сайко В. Ф. Биологические основы формирования продуктивности озимой пшеницы. Москва : Россельхозиздат, 1990. 132 с.

Олійник К. М., Голодна А. В. Морфофізіологічні особливості формування продуктивності пшениці ярої за сумісного вирощування з люпином вузьколистим. Наукові доповіді НУБіП України. 2016. № 6. URL: http://journals.nubip.edu.ua/index.php/Dopovidi/article/view/7548

Олійник К. М., Худолій Л. В. Вплив технології вирощування на формування елементів продуктивності пшениці озимої. Науковий вісник НУБіП України. Серія : Агрономія. 2013. № 183. С. 61–67.

Petr J. Nektera hlediska tvorby vynosu obilovin. Sb UVti. Genet. Slechteni. 1971. Vol. 7, No. 1. P. 1–12.

Грицюк П. М. Прогнозирование зернопроизводства как инст­румент обеспечения продовольственной безопасности государства. Моделирование и анализ безопасности и риска в сложных системах : труды 9 Междунар. научной школы (г. Санкт-Петербург, 6–10 июля 2010 г.). Санкт-Петербург, 2010. С. 301–305.

Tein B., Eremeev V., Keres I. et al. Effect of different plant production methods on yield and quality of winter wheat ‘Portal’ in 2009. Research for Rural Development : Proc. 16th Int. Sci. Conf. (Jelgava, Latvia, May 19–21, 2010). Jelgava, 2010. Vol. 1. P. 17–21.

Fischer R. A., Byerlee D., Edmeades G. O. Crop yields and global food security: Will yield increase continue to feed the world? / ACIAR Monograph No. 15. Canberra : Australian Centre for International Agricultural Research, 2014. Р. 52–59.

Савицкий М. С., Николаев М. Е. Структура урожая зерновых культур. Горки : БСХА, 1976. 20 с.

Ремесло В. Н., Сайко В. Ф. Сортовая агротехника пшеницы. Киев : Урожай, 1981. 200 с.

Foltyn J., Rostlins I. Serial – arhitectonika porostu psenise. Uroda. 1985. Vol. 33, No. 3. Р. 106–107.

Рабочая тетрадь агронома по интенсивным технологиям возделывания озимых культур / под ред. А. Г. Денисенко, В. М. Крутя. Киев : Урожай, 1986. 152 с.

Пшениця. Технічні умови : ДСТУ 3768:2010. [Чинний від 2010-03-31]. Київ : Держспоживстандарт України, 2010. 25 с.

Кононюк Л. М., Олійник К. М., Давидюк Г. В. та ін. Значення сорту в технології вирощування пшениці озимої в північній частині Лісостепу. Збірник наукових праць ННЦ «Ін-т землеробства НААН». 2012. Вип. 3–4. С. 64–70.

Черно О. Д. Фізичні та біохімічні показники якості зерна пшениці озимої за тривалого удобрення. Землеробство. 2015. Вип. 1. С. 98–102.

Petrenko V., Sheiko T., Khudolii L., Bondar V.Evaluation of three wheat species commonly used in organic cropping systems, considering selected technological parameters for ethanol production.Englineering for Rural Development : Proc. 17th Int. Sci. Conf. (Jelgava, Latvia, May 23–25, 2018). Jelgava, 2018. Vol. 17. P. 451–455. doi: 10.22616/ERDev2018.17.N030

Petrenk V., Spychaj R., Prysiazhniuk O. et al. Evaluation of three wheat species (Triticum aestivum L., T. spelta L., T. dicoccum (Schrank) Schuebl) commonly used in organic cropping systems, considering selected parameters of technological quality. Rom. Agric. Res. 2018. Vol. 35. P. 255–264.







Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

DOI: 10.21498/2518-1017

Flag Counter