Вихідний матеріал проса прутоподібного (Panicum virgatum L.) за комплексом господарсько-цінних ознак в умовах Центрального Лісостепу України

М. І. Кулик; Д. Б. Рахметов; І. І. Рожко; Н. О. Сиплива

doi:10.21498/2518-1017.15.4.2019.188549

Authors

М. І. Кулик Poltava State Agrarian Academy, Ukraine https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0241-6408
Д. Б. Рахметов M. M. Hryshko National Botanical Garden, NAS of Ukraine, Ukraine https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7260-3263
І. І. Рожко Poltava State Agrarian Academy, Ukraine https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0646-4004
Н. О. Сиплива Ukrainian Institute for Plant Variety Examination, Ukraine https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0921-6361

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21498/2518-1017.15.4.2019.188549

Keywords:

switchgrass, varieties, cultivation conditions, air temperature, rainfall, seed, yield

Abstract

Purpose. To study switchgrass varietal specimens (‘Zoriane’, ‘Morozko’, ‘Liniia 1307’ and ‘Cave-in-Rock’) according to economically valuable traits, and to distinguish the most yielding specimens with high yield of certified seed in relation to the weather conditions of the vegetation period (hydrothermal coefficient).

Methods. Methods of scientific research in agronomy, laboratory-field method – to determine the quantitative indicators of vegetative and generative parts of plants and the weight of 1000 seeds, quantitative-weight methods – to determine crop productivity and yield of certified seed; statistical processing of research results was performed by a dispersion analysis and variation statistics.

Results. Varietal specimens ‘Zoriane’ and ‘Liniia 1307’ formed the highest quantitative indicators of vegetative (height of plants, number of stems and leaves, length of flag leaf) and generative part of plants (panicle length and width, number of twigs of the first order, number of panicles and weight of seeds from panicle) independently from the cultivation conditions. Influence of biometric (quantitative) indicators of the generative part of plants, in close interaction with the weather conditions by HTC during the vegetation period, on the seed productivity, which affects the total crop yield, has been determined according to the research results. Seed yield of switchgrass varietal specimens by the determination coefficient (d) depends on: 53–59% – the number of twigs of the first order, 48–52% – the number of panicles, 12–21% – the seeds size, and 6–12% – the length and width of panicle.

Conclusion. Variety ‘Zoriane’ and ‘Liniia 1307’, which form weighty seeds, high seed yield (more than 250 kg/ha) of certified seed (about 65%) have been distinguished and can be used in further breeding work to create and expand switchgrass assortment. In future, this will allow to get seed material of high quality without any additional cost as well as to establish new energy plantations for the production of plant biomass for energy purposes and additional products for various industries.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

М. І. Кулик, Poltava State Agrarian Academy

Kulyk, M. І.

Д. Б. Рахметов, M. M. Hryshko National Botanical Garden, NAS of Ukraine

Rakhmetov, D. B.

І. І. Рожко, Poltava State Agrarian Academy

Rozhko, І. І.

Н. О. Сиплива, Ukrainian Institute for Plant Variety Examination

Syplyva, N. O.

References

Wolf, D. D., & Fiske, D. A. (2009). Planting and Managing Switchgrass for Forage, Wildlife, and Conservation / Virginia Cooperative Extension, publication 418-013. Retrieved from http://pubs.ext.vt.edu/418/418-013/418-013_pdf.pdf

Min, D., & Kapp, C. (2010). Assessing the feasibility of producing switchgrass in the U.P. Michigan Farm News. Retrieved from http://www.michiganfarmbureau.com/farmnews/transform.php?xml=20100430/switchgrass.xml

Roik, M. V., Kurylo, V. L., Humentyk, M. Ya., Hanzhenko, O. M., Kvak, V. M. (2011). Efficiency of cultivation high-yield energy crops. Vìsnik Lʹvìvsʹkogo nacìonalʹnogo agrarnogo unìversitetu. Agronomìâ [Bulletin of Lviv National Agrarian University. Agronomy], 15(2), 85–90. [in Ukrainian]

Petrychenko, S. M., Herasymenko, O. V., Honcharuk, H. S., Lytvyniuk, V. V., & Mandrovska, S. M. (2011). Prospects for Growing Lighting as an Alternative Energy Source in Ukraine. Tsukrovi buriaky [Sugar Beet], 4, 13–14. [in Ukrainian]

Adler, P. R., Del Grosso, S. J., & Parton, W. J. (2007). Life-cycle assessment of net greenhouse-gas flux for bioenergy cropping systems. Ecol. Appl., 17(3), 675–691. doi: 10.1890/05-2018

Russi, D. (2008). An integrated assessment of a large-scale biodiesel production in Italy: killing several birds with one stone? Energ. Policy, 36(3), 1169–1180. doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2007.11.016

Lee, D., Owens, V. N., Boe, A., & Koo, B. (2009). Biomass and seed yields of big bluestem, switchgrass, and intermediate wheatgrass in response to manure and harvest timing at two topographic positions. GCB Bioenergy, 1(2), 171–179. doi: 10.1111/j.1757-1707.2009.01008.x

Williams, P. R., Inman, D., Aden, A., & Heath, G. A. (2009). Environmental and sustainability factors associated with next-generation biofuels in the U.S.: what do we really know? Environ. Sci. Technol., 43(13), 4763–4775. doi: 10.1021/es900250d

Rahman, M. M., Mostafiz, S. B., Paatero, J. V., Lahdelma, R. (2014). Extension of energy crops on surplus agricultural lands: A potentially viable option in developing countries while fossil fuel reserves are diminishing. Renew. Sust. Energ. Rev., 29, 108–119. doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2013.08.092

Brodowska, M. S., Muszyński, P., Haliniarz, M., Brodowski, R., Kowalczyk-Juśko, A., Sekutowski, T., & Kurzyna-Szklarek, M. (2018). Agronomic aspects of switchgrass cultivation and use for energy purposes. Appl. Ecol. Environ. Res., 16(5), 5715–5743. doi: 10.15666/aeer/1605_57155743

Parrish, D. J., & Fike, J. H. (2005). The biology and agronomy of Switchgrass for biofuels. Crit. Rev. Plant Sci., 24(4–5), 423–459. doi: 10.1080/07352680500316433

Kalinichenko, A. V., Vakulenko, Y. V., & Galych, O. A. (2014). Ecological and economic aspects of feasibility of using crop products in alternative energy. Aktualʹni problemi ekonomìki [Actual Problems of Economics], 11, 202–208.

Porter, C. L. (1996). An analysis of variation between upland and lowland switchgrass, Panicum virgatum L. in central Oklahoma. Ecology, 47(6), 980–992. doi: 10.2307/1935646

Moser, L. E., & Vogel, K. P. (1995). Switchgrass, big bluestem, and indiangrass. In Barnes, R. F., Miller, D. A., & Nelson, C. J. (Eds.), Forages. Vol. I: An introduction to grassland agriculture (pp. 409–420). (5th ed.). Ames: Iowa State Univ. Press.

Rakhmetov, D. B., Verhun, O. M., & Rakhmetova, S. O. (2014). Switchgrass – promising introducer at the National Botanical Garden M. Grishko NAASU. Introdukcìâ roslin [Plant Introduction], 3, 4–12. [in Ukrainian]

Kulyk, M., Shokalo, N., & Dinets, O. (2019). Morphometric indices of plants, biological peculiarities and productivity of industrial energy crops. In Development of modern science: the experience of European countries and prospects for Ukraine (pp. 411–431). (3rd ed.). Riga, Latvia: Baltija Publ. doi: 10.30525/978-9934-571-78-7_54

Samson, R., Delaquis, E., Deen, B., De Bruyn, J., & Eggimann, U. (2016). Switchgrass. Agronomy (pp. 20–22). Ontario: N.p. Retrieved from https://www.agrireseau.net/documents/Document_93992.pdf

Caddel, J. L., Kakani, G., Porter, D. R., Redfearn, D. D., Walker, N. R., Warren, J., Wu, Y., & Zhang, H. (2002). Switchgrass Production Guide for Oklahoma (pp. 28–30). Stillwater, OK: Oklahoma Cooperative Extension Service. Retrieved from: http://switchgrass.okstate.edu/productionguide/productionguide.pdf

Moroz, O. V., Smirnykh, V. M., Kurylo, V. L. Herasymenko, Yu. P., Mostovna, N. A., Horobets, A. M., & Kulyk, M. I. (2011). Switchgrass as a new phyto-energy culture. Tsukrovi buriaky [Sugar Beet], 3, 12–14. [in Ukrainian]

Wolf, D. D., & Fiske, D. A. (2009). Planting and Managing Switchgrass for Forage, Wildlife, and Conservation (pp. 418–423) / Virginia Cooperative Extension, publication 418-013. Retrieved from http://pubs.ext.vt.edu/418/418-013/418-013_pdf.pdf.

Orlov, S. D. (2013). Features of the manifestation of biological and economic characteristics of switchgrass for the purpose of creating varieties with high energy value in the Forest-steppe zone of Ukraine. Nauk. praci Inst. bioeneg. kul’t. cukrov. burâkiv [Scientific papers of the Institute of Bioenergy Crops and Sugar Beet], 19, 93–95. [in Ukrainian]

Kurylo, V. L., Humentyk, M. Ya., Honcharuk, H. S., Smirnykh, V. M., Horobets, A. M., Kaskiv, V. V., Maksymenko, O. V., & Mandrovska, S. M. (2012). Metodychni rekomendatsii z provedennia osnovnoho ta peredposivnoho obrobitkiv gruntu i sivby prosa lozovydnoho [Methodological recommendations for basic and pre-sowing tillage and sowing of switchgrass]. Kyiv: N.p. [in Ukrainian]

Christian, D. G., & Elbersen, H. W. (1998). Switchgrass (Panicum virgatum L.). In N. El Bassam (Ed.), Energy plant species. Their use and impact on environment and development (pp. 257–263).London: James & James Publ.

Okhorona prav na sorty roslyn [Plant Variety Rights Protection] (pp. 221–222). (2015). Kyiv: PP OSTINTEK. [in Ukrainian]

Elbersen, H. W., Christian, D. G., El-Bassem, N., Bacher, W., Sauerbeck, G., Alexopoulou, E., … Parker, S. R. (2001). Switchgrass variety choice in Europe. Asp. Appl. Biol., 65, 21–28.

Moiseichenko, V. F., & Yeshchenko, V. O. (1994). Osnovy naukovykh doslidzhen v ahronomii [Fundamentals of scientific research in agronomy]. Kyiv: Vyshcha shkola. [in Ukrainian]

Tkachyk, S. O. (Ed.). (2016). Metodyka provedennia ekspertyzy sortiv roslyn hrupy tekhnichnykh na vidminnist, odnoridnist i stabilnist [Methods of examination of plant varieties of the technical group for difference, uniformity and stability]. Vinnytsia: N.p. [in Ukrainian]

Kulyk, M. I., Rakhmetov, D. B., & Kurylo, V. L. (2017). Metodyka provedennia polovykh ta laboratornykh doslidzhen z prosom prutopodibnym (Panicum virgatum L.) [Methods of conducting field and laboratory studies with Switchgrass (Panicum virgatum L.)].Poltava: RVV PDAA. [in Ukrainian]

Tkachyk, S. O. (Ed.). (2016). Metodyka provedennia ekspertyzy sortiv roslyn hrupy tekhnichnykh ta kormovykh na prydatnist do poshyrennia v Ukraini [Methods of examination of plant varieties of technical and fodder groups for suitability for distribution inUkraine]. Vinnytsia: N.p. [in Ukrainian]

Nasinnia silskohospodarskykh kultur. Sortovi ta posivni yakosti. Tekhnichni umovy: DSTU 2240:93 [Seeds of agricultural crops. Variety and sowing qualities. Specifications: State Standart 2240:93]. (1994). Kyiv: Derzhstandart Ukrainy. [in Ukrainian]

Doronin, V. A., Kravchenko, Yu. A., Busol, M. V., Doronin, V. V., & Mandrovska, S. M. (2015). Determination of Svitchgras sprouting energy and seed germination. Vìsnik Umansʹkogo NUS [Bulletin of Uman NUH], 1, 64–68. [in Ukrainian]

Vaynagiy, I.V. (1974). On the methodology for studying the seed productivity of herbaceous plants. Botaničeskij Žurnal [Botanical Journal], 59(6), 826–831. [in Russian]

Borovikov, V. P. (2003). Statistica. Iskusstvo analiza dannykh na komp’yutere: dlya professionalov [Statistica. The art of computer data analysis: for professionals]. (2nd ed.).St. Petersburg: Piter. [in Russian]