Economic and biological assessment of Tartary buckwheat variety ‘Kalyna’

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21498/2518-1017.16.4.2020.224050

Keywords:

growing season duration, morphological indicators, productivity and quality indicators

Abstract

Purpose. To evaluate Tartary buckwheat variety ‘Kalyna’ according to morphological, productive and quality indicators in the conditions of the Research Center “State Agra­rian and Engineering University in Podilia”.

Methods. The studies were carried out in the field crop rotation of the Research Center “Podillia” of the State Agrarian and Engi­neering University in Podilia (SAEU) in 2015–2020. The soil cover of the experimental field is represented mainly by low-humus, weakly leached soils. Experiment setting, material evaluation, analysis of plants, yield and grain quality were carried out in accordance with the generally accepted methods of state variety testing. An assessment of the Tartary buckwheat variety ‘Kalyna’ was carried out in comparison with the common buckwheat variety ‘Victoriia’.

Results. The growing season duration of Tartary buckwheat variety ‘Kalyna’ was 87 days (38 days vegetative and 49 days gene­rative). In the studied variety, a larger number of the 1st order branches up to 5.5 pcs was observed. The number of leaves on the plant was 22–28 pcs./plants. In the studied variety, more than 50% of the grains were located on the main stem and the first order branches, while in common buckwheat this indicator was only 30%. Productivity was 2,28 t/ha, the number of grains in inflorescences was 4,4 grains, in common buckwheat – 0,72 t/ha, and 2.2 grains/inflorescence, respectively. The thousand kernel weight in Tartary buckwheat variety ‘Kalyna’ is 10.2 g less than in common buckwheat variety ‘Victoriia’ and is 17.4 g, with hulls – 19.5%, which is 3.2% less then in common buckwheat variety.Assessment of Tartary buckwheat variety ‘Kalyna’ for resistance to the effects of bio- and abiotic factors indicates that it was at the level of common buckwheat variety ‘Victoriia’.In terms of resistance to abiotic factors, ‘Kalyna’ variety is characterized by high resistance to spontaneous fallof grain (5 scores) and has simultaneous grain ripening (5 scores).

Conclusions.The morphological and economic-biological indicators of Tartary buckwheat variety ‘Kalyna’ are significantly higher than the common buckwheat varie­ty ‘Victoriia’. It is recommended to grow Tartary buckwheat variety ‘Kalyna’ as a valuable cereal crop in the Western Forest-Steppe zone.

Author Biographies

Т. М. Хоменко, Ukrainian Institute of Plant Variety Examination

Tetiana Khomenko

О. В. Ночвіна, Ukrainian Institute of Plant Variety Examination

Olena Nochvina

References

Zhou, M., Kreft, I., Suvorova, G., Tang, Y., & Woo, S. H. (Eds.). (2018). Buckwheat Germplasm in the World.Massachusetts: Academic Press. doi: 10.1016/C2016-0-00602-2

Borovaya, S. A., & Klykov, A. G. (2020). Some aspects of biosynthesis and accumulation of flavonoids in plants buckwheat. Plant Biotechnol. Rep., 14, 213–225. doi: 10.1007/s11816-020-00614-9

Havrylianchyk, R. Yu. (2015). Prospects for tartar buckwheat introduction into culture in Ukraine. Zbirnyk naukovykh pratz Podilskoho derzhavnoho ahrarno-tekhnichnoho universytetu [Zbirnyk science works of the State Agrarian and Engineering University in Podillia], 23, 45–54. [in Ukranian]

Dziedzic, K., Górecka, D., Szwengiel, A., Sulewska, H., Kreft, I., Gujska, E., & Walkowiak, J. (2018). The Content of Dietary Fibre and Polyphenols in Morphological Parts of Buckwheat (Fago­pyrum tataricum). Plant Food. Hum. Nutr., 73(1), 82–88. doi: 10.1007/s11130-018-0659-0

Huang, X. Y., Zeller, F. J., Hung, K. F., Shi, T. X., & Chen, Q. F. (2014). Variation of major minerals and trace elements in seeds of tartary buckwheat (Fagopyrum tataricum Gaertn.). Genet. Resour. Crop Evol., 61(3), 567–577. doi: 10.1007/s10722-013-0057-2

Liu, H., Lv, M., Peng, Q., Shan, F., & Wang, M. (2015). Physicochemical and Textural Properties of Tartary Buckwheat Starch after Heat-moisture Treatment at Different Moisture Levels. Starch, 67(34), 276–284. doi: 10.1002/star.201400143

Prakash, S., & Yadav, K. (2016). Buckwheat (Fagopyrum esculentum) as a functional food: A nutraceutical pseudocereal. Int. J. Curr. Trend. Pharmacobiol. Med. Sci., 1(3), 1–15.

Fan, Z. (2016). Chemical composition and health effects of Tartary buckwheat. Food Chem., 203, 231–245. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2016.02.050

Li, B., Li, Y., & Hu, Q. (2016). Antioxidant activity of flavonoids of tartary buckwheat bran. Environ. Toxicol. Chem., 98(3–4), 429–438. doi: 10.1080/02772248.2015.1123486

Zhang, H., Wang, Q. H., Wu, S. Y., Zhang, T. T., Wu, T., Che, Z. M., … & Li, W. L. (2018). Effect of Steaming and Hot-air Drying on the Physical and Chemical Quality of Yellow or Black Tartary Buckwheat. Sci. Technol. Food Ind., 39(21), 66–76. doi: 10.13386/j.issn1002-0306.2018.21.012

Rauf, M., Yoon, H., Lee, S., Hyun, D., Lee, M., Sejong, Oh. S., & Choi, Yu. (2019). Evaluation of Sprout Growth Traits and Flavonoid Content in Common and Tartary Buckwheat Germplasms. Plant Breed. Biotech., 7(4), 375–385. doi: 10.9787/PBB.2019.7.4.37

Brites, L., Ortolan, F., Silva, D., Bueno, F., Rocha, T., Chang, Y., & Steel, C. (2019). Gluten-free cookies elaborated with buckwheat flour, millet flour and chia seeds. Food Sci. Technol., 39(2), 458–466. doi: 10.1590/fst.30416

Patil, S. B., & Jena, S. (2020). Utilization of underrated pseudo-cereals of North East India: a systematic review. Nutr. Food Sci., 50(6), 1229–1240. doi: 10.1108/NFS-11-2019-0339

Ge, R., & Wang, H. (2020). Nutrient components and bioactive compounds in tartary buckwheat bran and flour as affected by thermal processing. Int. J. Food Prop., 23(1), 127–137. doi: 10.1080/10942912.2020.171315

Demchenko, O. A., Yuzvenko, L. V., Radchenko, V. H., Shevchuk, V. K., & Boiko, A. L. (2014). Fagopyrum tataricum Gaertn collection phytopathological research. Agrobìologìâ [Agrobio­logy], 2, 23–26. [in Ukrainian]

Methods of examination of edible buckwheat varieties for difference, homogeneity and stability (2016). In S. O. Tkachyk (Ed.), Metodyka provedennia ekspertyzy sortiv roslyn hrupy zernobobovykh ta krupianykh na vidminnist, odnoridnist i stabilnist [Methodology of plant varieties examination for distinctiveness, uniformity and stability] (pp. 129–140). (2nd ed., rev. аnd enl.). Vinnytsia: FOP Korzun D. Yu. [in Ukrainian]

Tkachyk, S. O. (2016). Metodyka provedennia ekspertyzy sortiv roslyn hrupy zernovykh, krupianykh ta zernobobovykh na prydatnist do poshyrennia v Ukraini [Method for DUS examination of grain, cereal and leguminous varieties in Ukraine]. Vinny­tsia: FOP Korzun D. Yu. [in Ukrainian]

Published

2020-12-22

Issue

Section

VARIETY STUDYING AND VARIETY SCIENCE