Economic and biological assessment of Tartary buckwheat variety ‘Kalyna’
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21498/2518-1017.16.4.2020.224050Keywords:
growing season duration, morphological indicators, productivity and quality indicatorsAbstract
Purpose. To evaluate Tartary buckwheat variety ‘Kalyna’ according to morphological, productive and quality indicators in the conditions of the Research Center “State Agrarian and Engineering University in Podilia”.
Methods. The studies were carried out in the field crop rotation of the Research Center “Podillia” of the State Agrarian and Engineering University in Podilia (SAEU) in 2015–2020. The soil cover of the experimental field is represented mainly by low-humus, weakly leached soils. Experiment setting, material evaluation, analysis of plants, yield and grain quality were carried out in accordance with the generally accepted methods of state variety testing. An assessment of the Tartary buckwheat variety ‘Kalyna’ was carried out in comparison with the common buckwheat variety ‘Victoriia’.
Results. The growing season duration of Tartary buckwheat variety ‘Kalyna’ was 87 days (38 days vegetative and 49 days generative). In the studied variety, a larger number of the 1st order branches up to 5.5 pcs was observed. The number of leaves on the plant was 22–28 pcs./plants. In the studied variety, more than 50% of the grains were located on the main stem and the first order branches, while in common buckwheat this indicator was only 30%. Productivity was 2,28 t/ha, the number of grains in inflorescences was 4,4 grains, in common buckwheat – 0,72 t/ha, and 2.2 grains/inflorescence, respectively. The thousand kernel weight in Tartary buckwheat variety ‘Kalyna’ is 10.2 g less than in common buckwheat variety ‘Victoriia’ and is 17.4 g, with hulls – 19.5%, which is 3.2% less then in common buckwheat variety.Assessment of Tartary buckwheat variety ‘Kalyna’ for resistance to the effects of bio- and abiotic factors indicates that it was at the level of common buckwheat variety ‘Victoriia’.In terms of resistance to abiotic factors, ‘Kalyna’ variety is characterized by high resistance to spontaneous fallof grain (5 scores) and has simultaneous grain ripening (5 scores).
Conclusions.The morphological and economic-biological indicators of Tartary buckwheat variety ‘Kalyna’ are significantly higher than the common buckwheat variety ‘Victoriia’. It is recommended to grow Tartary buckwheat variety ‘Kalyna’ as a valuable cereal crop in the Western Forest-Steppe zone.
Downloads
References
Zhou, M., Kreft, I., Suvorova, G., Tang, Y., & Woo, S. H. (Eds.). (2018). Buckwheat Germplasm in the World.Massachusetts: Academic Press. doi: 10.1016/C2016-0-00602-2
Borovaya, S. A., & Klykov, A. G. (2020). Some aspects of biosynthesis and accumulation of flavonoids in plants buckwheat. Plant Biotechnol. Rep., 14, 213–225. doi: 10.1007/s11816-020-00614-9
Havrylianchyk, R. Yu. (2015). Prospects for tartar buckwheat introduction into culture in Ukraine. Zbirnyk naukovykh pratz Podilskoho derzhavnoho ahrarno-tekhnichnoho universytetu [Zbirnyk science works of the State Agrarian and Engineering University in Podillia], 23, 45–54. [in Ukranian]
Dziedzic, K., Górecka, D., Szwengiel, A., Sulewska, H., Kreft, I., Gujska, E., & Walkowiak, J. (2018). The Content of Dietary Fibre and Polyphenols in Morphological Parts of Buckwheat (Fagopyrum tataricum). Plant Food. Hum. Nutr., 73(1), 82–88. doi: 10.1007/s11130-018-0659-0
Huang, X. Y., Zeller, F. J., Hung, K. F., Shi, T. X., & Chen, Q. F. (2014). Variation of major minerals and trace elements in seeds of tartary buckwheat (Fagopyrum tataricum Gaertn.). Genet. Resour. Crop Evol., 61(3), 567–577. doi: 10.1007/s10722-013-0057-2
Liu, H., Lv, M., Peng, Q., Shan, F., & Wang, M. (2015). Physicochemical and Textural Properties of Tartary Buckwheat Starch after Heat-moisture Treatment at Different Moisture Levels. Starch, 67(34), 276–284. doi: 10.1002/star.201400143
Prakash, S., & Yadav, K. (2016). Buckwheat (Fagopyrum esculentum) as a functional food: A nutraceutical pseudocereal. Int. J. Curr. Trend. Pharmacobiol. Med. Sci., 1(3), 1–15.
Fan, Z. (2016). Chemical composition and health effects of Tartary buckwheat. Food Chem., 203, 231–245. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2016.02.050
Li, B., Li, Y., & Hu, Q. (2016). Antioxidant activity of flavonoids of tartary buckwheat bran. Environ. Toxicol. Chem., 98(3–4), 429–438. doi: 10.1080/02772248.2015.1123486
Zhang, H., Wang, Q. H., Wu, S. Y., Zhang, T. T., Wu, T., Che, Z. M., … & Li, W. L. (2018). Effect of Steaming and Hot-air Drying on the Physical and Chemical Quality of Yellow or Black Tartary Buckwheat. Sci. Technol. Food Ind., 39(21), 66–76. doi: 10.13386/j.issn1002-0306.2018.21.012
Rauf, M., Yoon, H., Lee, S., Hyun, D., Lee, M., Sejong, Oh. S., & Choi, Yu. (2019). Evaluation of Sprout Growth Traits and Flavonoid Content in Common and Tartary Buckwheat Germplasms. Plant Breed. Biotech., 7(4), 375–385. doi: 10.9787/PBB.2019.7.4.37
Brites, L., Ortolan, F., Silva, D., Bueno, F., Rocha, T., Chang, Y., & Steel, C. (2019). Gluten-free cookies elaborated with buckwheat flour, millet flour and chia seeds. Food Sci. Technol., 39(2), 458–466. doi: 10.1590/fst.30416
Patil, S. B., & Jena, S. (2020). Utilization of underrated pseudo-cereals of North East India: a systematic review. Nutr. Food Sci., 50(6), 1229–1240. doi: 10.1108/NFS-11-2019-0339
Ge, R., & Wang, H. (2020). Nutrient components and bioactive compounds in tartary buckwheat bran and flour as affected by thermal processing. Int. J. Food Prop., 23(1), 127–137. doi: 10.1080/10942912.2020.171315
Demchenko, O. A., Yuzvenko, L. V., Radchenko, V. H., Shevchuk, V. K., & Boiko, A. L. (2014). Fagopyrum tataricum Gaertn collection phytopathological research. Agrobìologìâ [Agrobiology], 2, 23–26. [in Ukrainian]
Methods of examination of edible buckwheat varieties for difference, homogeneity and stability (2016). In S. O. Tkachyk (Ed.), Metodyka provedennia ekspertyzy sortiv roslyn hrupy zernobobovykh ta krupianykh na vidminnist, odnoridnist i stabilnist [Methodology of plant varieties examination for distinctiveness, uniformity and stability] (pp. 129–140). (2nd ed., rev. аnd enl.). Vinnytsia: FOP Korzun D. Yu. [in Ukrainian]
Tkachyk, S. O. (2016). Metodyka provedennia ekspertyzy sortiv roslyn hrupy zernovykh, krupianykh ta zernobobovykh na prydatnist do poshyrennia v Ukraini [Method for DUS examination of grain, cereal and leguminous varieties in Ukraine]. Vinnytsia: FOP Korzun D. Yu. [in Ukrainian]
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2020 Л. А. Вільчинська
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Our journal abides by the CREATIVE COMMONS copyright rights and permissions for open access journals.
Authors, who are published in this journal, agree to the following conditions:
1. The authors reserve the right to authorship of the work and pass the first publication right of this work to the journal under the terms of a Creative Commons Attribution License, which allows others to freely distribute the published research with the obligatory reference to the authors of the original work and the first publication of the work in this journal.
2. The authors have the right to conclude separate supplement agreements that relate to non-exclusive work distribution in the form in which it has been published by the journal (for example, to upload the work to the online storage of the journal or publish it as part of a monograph), provided that the reference to the first publication of the work in this journal is included.
Ukrainian Institute for Plant Varieties Examination 
Селекційно-генетичний інститут
Institute of Plant Physiology and Genetics of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine
The National Academy of Agrarian Sciences of Ukraine