Efficiency of growing various soybeans varieties, depending on the effect of micronutrient fertilizers and growth regulators

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21498/2518-1017.16.4.2020.224057

Keywords:

biomass energy, PAR utilization rate, energy efficiency ratio, economic efficiency, yield

Abstract

Purpose. To determine the efficiency of growing soybean varieties ‘Ustia’, ‘Cordoba’, ‘Estafeta’ depending on the influence of microfertilizers and growth regulators.

Methods. Field, laboratory.

Results. The article presents the results of studying the efficiency of growing different varieties of soybeans. It was found that in the cultivar ‘Ustia’ the best values of assimilation of photosynthetically active radiation were obtained for the applications of Yara Vita Mono Molitrak in the budding phase (0.25 l/ha) with growth regulator Radostym, and Yara Vita Mono Molitrak in the budding phase (0.25 l/ha) + in the flowering phase (0.25 l/ha) with two studied growth regulators. Similar patterns of the utilization rate of photosynthetic radiation were obtained for the ‘Cordoba’ and ‘Estafeta’ varieties. According to the indicators of the energy balance, the complex use of micronutrient fertilizers and growth regulators in any case pays off with an increase in the yield, which means it is energetically expedient. The maximum coefficients of energy efficiency in the ‘Ustia’, ‘Cordoba’ and ‘Estafeta’ varieties were obtained with the introduction of micronutrient fertilizers Yara Vita Mono Molitrak in the budding phase (0.25 l/ha) + in the flowering phase (0.25 l/ha) and growth regulators Biosyl and Radostym. However, the use of growth regulators separately does not always provide an economic return on investment. In particular, in the variant without Yara Vita Mono Molitrak microfertilizer, the ‘Cordoba’ variety received 28 873 UAH/ha of net profit, while the introduction of growth regulators did not pay off, since there was no significant increase in the yield, and with the use of growth regulators Biosyl and Radostym net profit was within 28824–29179 UAH/ha. In general, the use of micronutrient fertilizer Yara Vita Mono Molitrak with growth regulators Radostim and Biosyl ensu­red guaranteed yield increase.

Conclusions. When gro­wing ‘Ustia’, ‘Cordoba’ and ‘Estafeta’ varieties from an energy point of view, it is better to use Yara Vita Mono Molitrak microfertilizer in the budding phase (0.25 l/ha) with the growth regulator Radostym. Under these conditions, the obtained energy efficiency ratio was 3.24; 3.41 and 3.45, and the profit was 31503, 34072 and 34649 UAH/ha, respectively

Author Biography

М. П. Байда, Verkhniachka Research and Breeding Station of the Institute of Bioenergy Crops and Sugar Beet, NAAS of Ukraine

Mykhailo Baida

References

Obsiah vyrobnytstva, urozhainist ta zibrana ploshcha silskohospodarskykh kultur za yikh vydamy po rehionakh stanom na 1 lystopada 2020 r. [Production volume, yield and harvested area of crops by their types by region as of November 1, 2020]. (2020). Kyiv: State Statistics Service ofUkraine. Retrieved from http://www.ukrstat.gov.ua/operativ/operativ2020/sg/ovuzpsg/ovuzpsg_1120.xls [in Ukrainian]

Moisiienko, V. V., & Didora, V. H. (2010). Agroeconomic substantiation of the role of soybean in solving the problem of vegetable protein in Ukraine. Vìsnik Žitomirsʹkogo nacìonalʹnogo agroekologìčnogo unìversitetu [Bulletin of Zhytomyr National Agroecological University], 1, 153–166. [in Ukrainian]

Petrychenko, V. F., Babych, A. O., & Kolisnyk, S. I. (2005). Ways of increasing the productivity of soya in the conditions of the Forest-Steppe of Ukraine. Selekciâ i nasìnnictvo [Plant Breeding and Seed Production], 90, 50–58. [in Ukrainian]

Prysiazhniuk, O. I., & Hryhorenko, S. V. (2018). Status and Prospects of Soybean Production in Ukraine. In Nauchnoe obespechenie proizvodstva soi: problemy i perspektivy [Scientific support for soy production: challenges and perspectives] (pp. 264–271).Blagoveshchensk: OOO «IPK «ODEON». [in Russian]

Zabolotnyi, O. H. (2006). Problemy pidvyshchennia efektyvnosti vyrobnytstva soi i tekhnolohii yii pererobky [Problems of increasing the efficiency of soybean production and processing technology]. Vinnytsia: Knyha-Veha. [in Ukrainian]

Prysiazhniuk, O. I., Hryhorenko, S. V., & Polovynchuk, O. Yu. (2018). Peculiarities of realization of biological potential of soybean varieties depending on technological methods of cultivation in the conditions of the Forest-Steppe of Ukraine. Plant Var. Stud. Prot., 14(2), 215–223. doi: 10.21498/2518-1017.14.2.2018.134773 [in Ukrainian]

7. Tarariko, O. H., & Ilienko, T. V. (2015) Predicting the impact of weather conditions on the yield of grain crops. Zemlerobstvo [Agriculture], 2, 66–72. [in Ukrainian]

8. Patyka, M. V., & Patyka, V. P. (2014). Current issues of biodiversity and climate fluctuation. Vìsn. agrar. nauki [Bull. Agric. Sci.], 6, 5–10. [in Ukrainian]

Mosondz, N. P. (2014). Formation of soybean productivity as affected by agronomical practices under the conditions of the northern part of the Forest-Steppe. Zemlerobstvo [Agriculture], 1–2, 74–78. [in Ukrainian]

Stryzhak, A. M. (2014). Studying the response of soybean of various maturity groups to drought under the conditions of the Central Forest-Steppe zone of Ukraine. In Selektsiia ta henetyka bobovykh kultur: suchasni aspekty ta perspektyvy: tezy Mizhnar. nauk. konf. [Breeding and genetics of legumes: modern aspects and prospects: Proc. Int. Sci. Conf.] (рр. 224–227). June 23–26, 2014, Оdesa,Ukraine. [in Ukrainian]

Petrychenko, V. F., Babych, A. O., & Ivaniuk, S. V. (2006). The role of climatic factors in the formation of breeding policy in the Forest-Steppe zone of Ukraine. Selekciâ i nasìnnictvo [Plant Breeding and Seed Production], 93, 60–67. [in Ukrainian]

Ermantraut, E. R., Hoptsii, T. I., Kalenska, S. M., Kryvoruchenko, R. V., Turchynova, N. P., & Prysiazhniuk, O. I. (2014). Metodyka selektsiinoho eksperymentu (v roslynnytstvi) [Method of selection experiment (crop)]. Kharkiv: N.p. [in Ukrainian]

Published

2020-12-22

Issue

Section

PLANT PRODUCTION