Evaluation of winter wheat varieties and promising lines of Myronovka’s intitute breeding in terms of grain quality
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21498/2518-1017.18.3.2022.269000Keywords:
winter wheat, variety, breeding lines, quality indicators, protein, gluten, flowering, ripeningAbstract
Purpose. To evaluate the varieties: ‘MIP Assol’, ‘Balada Myronivska’, ‘Hratsiia Myronivska’, ‘MIP Yuvileina’, ‘MIP Lada’, ‘MIP Dniprianka’ and the standard variety ‘Podolianka’ and promising breeding lines: ‘Erythrospermum 55023’, ‘Lutescens 22198’, ‘Lutescens 37519’, ‘Lutescens 60049’, ‘Lutescens 60107’ winter wheat of the Mironovka`s breeding according to grain quality indicators.
Methods. The research was conducted during the 2019–2021 in the breeding crop rotation of the winter wheat breeding laboratory of the V. M. Remeslo Myronivka Institute of Wheat, NAАS of Ukraine. The main method of research was laboratory and field, supplemented by analytical studies, measurements, calculations and observations.
Results. The following breeding lines were the best in terms of protein content during the first sowing period: ‘Erythrospermum 55023’ (11.9%), ‘Lutescens 55198’ (12.8%), ‘Lutescens 37519’ (11.7%) and ‘Lutescens 60107’ (10.7%). During the second sowing period, the best varieties and breeding lines turned out to be ‘Hratsiia Myronivska’ (11.4%), ‘MIP Dniprianka’ (12.3%), ‘Erythrospermum 55023’ (12.3 %), ‘Lutescens 55198’ (11.4%), ‘Lutescens 37519’ (12.3%) and ‘Lutescens 60049’ (12.8%). According to the grain vitrification index during the first sowing period, the following can be distinguished: ‘Balada Myronivska’ (86.7%), ‘MIP Lada’ (89.3%), ‘MIP Dniprianka’ (87.3%), ‘Erythrospermum 55023’ (86.3 %), ‘Lutescens 55198’ (94.3 %) and ‘Lutescens 37519’ (91.0 %). During the second sowing period, these were ‘Balada Myronivska’ (86.7%), ‘Hratsiia Myronivska’ (79.3%), ‘MIP Lada’ (85.0%), ‘MIP Dniprianka’ (81.7%) and breeding lines ‘Lutescens 55198’ (80.7%) and ‘Lutescens 60049’ (81.3%). According to the content of raw gluten, the variety ‘Hratsiia Myronivska’ (26.2%) was selected. For all studied breeding lines, the value of the crude gluten content indicator varied from 26.0% to 29.9%. During the second sowing period, a higher percentage of raw gluten content was noted in the varieties ‘Hratsiia Myronivska’ (29.9%) and ‘MIP Dniprianka’ (27.4%) and selection lines – ‘Erythrospermum 55023’ (28.4%), ‘Lutescens 55198’ (27.4%), ‘Lutescens 37519’ (27.1%) and ‘Lutescens 60049’ (29.1%).
Conclusions. During the three years of observations, the weather conditions differed in the amount of precipitation and the sum of active temperatures both during the growing season and during the period of flowering and maturation, which significantly affected the results of the analysis of grain quality indicators of winter wheat varieties and promising lines. Having analyzed the obtained results, it is possible to single out the varieties ‘Hratsiia Myronivska’ and ‘MIP Dniprianka’, as well as the breeding lines: ‘Erythrospermum 55023’, ‘Lutescens 55198’, ‘Lutescens 37519’ and ‘Lutescens 60049’, which exceeded the standard variety ‘Podolianka’ and the average experimental values for such basic indicators as protein content, gluten content, vitreousness and 1000-seed weight.
Downloads
References
Wheeler, T., & von Braun, J. (2013). Climate change impacts on global food security. Science, 341(6145), 508–513. doi: 10.1126/science.1239402
Dawson, T. P., Perryman, A. N., & Osborne, T. (2014). Modelling impacts of climate change on global food security. Climate Change, 134(3), 429–440. doi: 10.1007/s10584-014-1277-y
Gaitov, T. A., & Kantyukova, E. A. (2010). Foliar extra nutrition influence on the yeld and the quality of spring wheat grain. Achievements of Science and Technology of Agricultural Industry, 1, 32–34. [In russian]
Kramarev, S. M., Zhemela, H. P., & Shakalii, S. M. (2014). Productivity and grain quality of soft winter wheat depending on mineral nutrition in the conditions of the left-bank Forest-Steppe of Ukraine. Bulletin Institute of Agriculture of Steppe zone NAAS of Ukraine, 6, 61–67. [In Ukrainian]
Rybalka, O. I., Morgun, B. V., & Pochynok, V. M. (2012). Modern studies of wheat grain quality in the world: genetics, biotechnology and nutritional value of reserve proteins. Physiology and Biochemistry of Cultivated Plants, 44(1), 3–22. [In russian]
Pochynok, V. M., & Radchenko, O. M. (2011). Current state of research on reserve proteins of wheat. Physiology and Biochemistry of Cultivated Plants, 43(3), 255–266. [In russian]
Barabolia, O. V. (2008). The influence of agroecological factors on the yield and quality of durum spring wheat in the Left-Bank Forest-Steppe humid subzone (Ph.D. diss.) (pp. 197–198). Poltava: N.p. [In Ukrainian]
Zvonar, A. M., & Miroshnychenko, M. M. (2020). Influence of weather conditions of the year and varietal characteristics on nitrogen consumption and formation of winter wheat grain quality. Ukrainian Black Sea Region Agrarian Science, 3, 87–95. [In Ukrainian]
Popov, S. I. (2000). Influence of weather conditions of the year and variety features on nitrogen consumption and formation of winter wheat grain quality. Plant Breeding and Seed Production, 84, 84–92. [In Ukrainian]
DSTU 3768–04. Wheat. Specifications. (2014). Kyiv: Derzhstandart Ukrainy. [In Ukrainian]
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Our journal abides by the CREATIVE COMMONS copyright rights and permissions for open access journals.
Authors, who are published in this journal, agree to the following conditions:
1. The authors reserve the right to authorship of the work and pass the first publication right of this work to the journal under the terms of a Creative Commons Attribution License, which allows others to freely distribute the published research with the obligatory reference to the authors of the original work and the first publication of the work in this journal.
2. The authors have the right to conclude separate supplement agreements that relate to non-exclusive work distribution in the form in which it has been published by the journal (for example, to upload the work to the online storage of the journal or publish it as part of a monograph), provided that the reference to the first publication of the work in this journal is included.