Оцінка вихідного селекційного матеріалу  тритикале озимого за основними ознаками  придатності до переробки на біоетанол

О. С. Левченко; В. М. Стариченко

doi:10.21498/2518-1017.16.1.2020.201018

Authors

О. С. Левченко NSC ‘Institute of Agriculture of NAAS’, Ukraine https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1639-326X
В. М. Стариченко NSC ‘Institute of Agriculture of NAAS’, Ukraine https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4551-8263

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21498/2518-1017.16.1.2020.201018

Keywords:

yield, protein and starch content, correlation, size of starch granules, Triticosecale Witt

Abstract

Purpose. To analyze collection samples by yield, protein and starch content in grain, its granulometric composition and highlight valuable sources for creating varieties suitable for bioethanol processing.

Methods. To assess the collection material, field, laboratory, measurement and weight, mathematical and statistical research methods were used. The analysis of chemical quality indicators of triticale grain was carried out by infrared spectrometry on an Infratec 1241 device. The size of starch granules was determined by light microscopy and using the ImageJ computer program. Statistical processing of the obtained research results was carried out with the introduction of the computer program Statistica 6.

Results. The results of studies on the collection of winter triticale by the main signs of suitability for bioethanol processing are presented. The grain yield in collection samples on average over the years of research ranged from 3.69 to 5.17 t/ha. The best samples were identified – numbers 181, 101, 185, 219 and the variety ’Arystokrat’ with a yield of 5.01–5.17 t/ha. By the high starch content numbers 123 (69.5%), 101 (69.8%) and the varieties ‘Petrol’ (69.0%), ‘Solodiuk’ (70.1%) and ‘Liubomyr’ (70.3%) were selected. A moderate negative correlation was found between yield and protein content (r = -0.37) and a significant negative correlation was found between starch and protein content (r = -0.64). The analysis of collection samples of winter triticale by granulometric starch composition was carried out. Maximum size of starch granules in the collection samples ranged from 19.4 to 32.7 µm, the minimum – 9.9 to 15.7 µm, and the variability range for the average size of granules was 15.4–20.0 µm. Varieties ‘Yasha’ and ‘Mundo’ were distinguished by the smallest average granule size of starch (15.4 and 15.6 µm) and uniformity of particle size distribution.

Conclusions. Sources of valuable traits were identified by high productivity, starch content and aligned and fine granule size distribution. A moderate correlation between productivity and protein content and a significant negative correlation between starch and protein content was revealed.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

О. С. Левченко, NSC ‘Institute of Agriculture of NAAS’

Levchenko O. S.

В. М. Стариченко, NSC ‘Institute of Agriculture of NAAS’

Starуchenko V. M.

References

Zabed, H., Sahu, J. N., Suely, A., Boyce, A. N., & Faruq, G. (2017). Bioethanol production from renewable sources: Current perspectives and technological progress. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev., 71, 475–501. doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2016.12.076

Brai, V. V., & Shchutskyi, I. V. (2016). Bioethanol in Ukraine. Vìsn. Nac. Akad. Nauk Ukr. [Herald of National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine], 6, 71–76. doi: 10.15407/visn2016.06.071 [in Ukrainian]

Chervonis, M. V., & Surzhenko, I. O. (2009). Breeding criterias for varieties and hybrids of cereals for bioethanol production. Zbìrnik naukovih prac SGÌ – NCNS [Collected Scientific Articles of PBGI – NCSCI], 14, 27–36. [in Ukrainian].

Obuchowski, W., Banaszak, Z., Makowska, A., & Łuczak, M. (2010). Factors affecting usefulness of triticale grain for bioethanol production. J. Sci. Food Agric., 90(14), 2506–2511. doi: 10.1002/jsfa.4113

McKenzie, R. H., Bremer, E., Middleton, A. B., Beres, B., Yoder, C., Hietamaa, C., … Henriquez, B. (2014). Agronomic practices for bioethanol production from spring triticale in Alberta. Can. J. Plant Sci., 94(1), 15–22. doi: 10.4141/cjps2013-112

Cantale, C., Petrazzuolo, F., Correnti, A., Farneti, A., Felici, F., Latini, A., & Galeffi, P. (2016). Triticale for bioenergy production. Agric. Agric. Sci. Procedia, 8, 609–616. doi: 10.1016/j.aaspro.2016.02.083

Habtamu, A., Tadele, T. K., Twain, J. B., & Xue-Feng, M. (2018). Triticale Improvement for Forage and Cover Crop Uses in the Southern Great Plains of the United States. Front Plant Sci., 9, 1130. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2018.01130

McGoverin, C. M., Snyders, F., Muller, N., Botes, W., Fox, G., & Manley, M. (2011). A review of triticale uses and the effect of growth environment on grain quality. J. Sci. Food Agric., 91(7), 1155–1165. doi: 10.1002/jsfa.4338

Dumbravă, M., Ion, V., Epure, L. I., Băşa, A. G., Ion, N., & Duşa, E. M. (2016). Yield and Yield Components at Triticale under Different Technological Conditions. Agric. Agric. Sci. Procedia, 10, 94–103. doi: 10.1016/j.aaspro.2016.09.023

Grabovec, A. I., Andreev, N. R., Krohmal, A. V., & Shevchenko, N. A. (2013). Problems of breeding of triticale with a high content of starch in grain and its use. Doklady Rossiiskoi akademii sel’skokhozyaistvennykh nauk [Reports of the Russian Academy of Agricultural Sciences], 5, 14–16. [in Russian]

Overchenko, M. B., Ignatova, N. I., Serba, E. M., Shelehova, N. V., Veselovskaya, O. V., Abramovа, I. M., & Rimareva, L. V. (2014). Study Triticale Different Varieties for Use in Alcohol Production. Pivo i napitki [Beer and Beverages], 6, 14–18. [in Russian]

Grabovec, A. I., Overchenko, M. B., Ignatova, N. I., & Grichikova, G. N. (2015). Triticale breeding for fermentation production: results and problems. Zernobobovye i krupânye kulʹtury [Leguminous and Groat Crops], 2, 63–68. [in Russian]

Kopus, M. M., Kopus, E. M., & Paraponov, A. A. (2010). Quality of triticale grain as raw material for bioethanol production in the south of Russia. In Tritikale: mater. Mezhdunar. prakt. konf. «Rol tritikale v stabilizatsii i uvelichenii proizvodstva zerna i kormov» [Triticale: Proc. of the Int. Pract. Conf. “The Role of Triticale in Stabilizing and Increasing Grain and Feed Production”] (pp. 238–242). March 15–17, 2010, Rostov-on-Don, Russia. [in Russian]

Rybalka, O. І. (2012). Triticale and energy. The prospect of an underrated culture. Zerno [Grain], 9, 34–37. [in Russian]

Rybalka, A. I., Chervonis, M. V., Morgun, B. V., Pochinok, V. M., & Polischuk, S. S. (2013). Genetic and breeding criteria of crop cultivars production for ethanol distilling end-use. Fiziol. Biokhim. Kul’t. Rast. [Physiology and Biochemistry of Cultivated Plants], 45(1), 3–19. [in Ukrainian]

Jaiswal, S., Båga, М., Ahuja, G., Rossnagel, В., & Chibbar, R. (2014). Development of barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) lines with altered starch granule size distribution. J. Agric. Food Chem., 62(10), 2289–2296. doi: 10.1021/jf405424x

Yu, A., Li, Y., Ni, Y., Yang, W., Yang, D., Cui, Zh., Wang, Zh., & Yin, Y. (2014). Differences of starch granule distribution in grains from different spikelet positions in winter wheat. PLoS ONE, 9(12), e114342. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0114342

Xurun, Y., Heng, Y., Jing, Z., Shanshan, S., & Liang, Z. (2015). Comparison of endosperm starch granule development and physicochemical properties of starches from waxy and non-waxy wheat. Int. J. Food Prop., 18(11), 2409–2421. doi: 10.1080/10942912.2014.980949

Cornejo-Ramírez, Y. I., Cinco-Moroyoqui, F. J., Ramírez-Reyes, F., Rosas-Burgos, E. C., Osuna-Amarillas, P. S., Wong-Corral, F. J., Borboa-Flores, J., & Cota-Gastélum, A. G. (2015). Physicochemical characterization of starch from hexaploid triticale (Triticosecale Wittmack) genotypes. CYTA-J. Food., 13(3), 420–426. doi: 10.1080/19476337.2014.994565

Li, W., Yan, S., Shi, X., Zhang, C., Shao, Q., Xu, F., & Wang, J. (2016). Starch granule size distribution from twelve wheat cultivars in east China’s Huaibei region. Can. J. Plant Sci., 96(2), 176–182. doi: 10.1139/cjps-2015-0048