Оцінювання врожайності та стабільності генотипів пшениці м’якої озимої (Triticum aestivum L.) залежно від попередників та строків сівби

І. В. Правдзіва; О. А. Демидов; В. М. Гудзенко; О. Л. Дергачов

doi:10.21498/2518-1017.16.3.2020.214923

Authors

І. В. Правдзіва The V. M. Remeslo Myronivka Institute of Wheat, NAAS of Ukraine, Ukraine https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0808-1584
О. А. Демидов The V. M. Remeslo Myronivka Institute of Wheat, NAAS of Ukraine, Ukraine https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5715-2908
В. М. Гудзенко The V. M. Remeslo Myronivka Institute of Wheat, NAAS of Ukraine, Ukraine https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9738-1203
О. Л. Дергачов The V. M. Remeslo Myronivka Institute of Wheat, NAAS of Ukraine, Ukraine https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8615-7110

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21498/2518-1017.16.3.2020.214923

Keywords:

bread winter wheat, yield, stability, year of cultivation, coefficient of variation, ANOVA, GGE biplot

Abstract

Purpose. To determine the effectiveness of using contrasting sowing dates after different predecessors to assess the genotypes of bread winter wheat in terms of yield and stability.

Methods. Field, laboratory, mathematical statistics.

Results. A different, but reliable level of influence on the yield of bread winter wheat genotypes of such factors as conditions of the year of cultivation (66.2%), predecessors (12.5%), sowing date (6.1%) and genotype (1.7% ) was revealed. Significant differences were noted in the response of the studied genotypes to the sowing date after different predecessors. Relatively less influence of the predecessors on the yield of the varieties ‘Estafeta Myronivska’ and ‘Vezha Myronivska’ was revealed, more – for the varieties ‘MIP Darunok’, ‘MIP Kniazhna’ and ‘MIP Vyshyvanka’. The sowing dates had less influence on the yield of the varieties ‘MIP Fortuna’, ‘MIP Vyshyvanka’ and ‘Trudivnytsia Myronivska’. A general tendency for decrease in the average annual yield was established in the experiment with a shift in the sowing dates from September 26 to October 16. However, for the number of genotypes after certain predecessors, the optimal sowing date was the 5th of October: after the predecessor, green-manure fallow – for varieties ‘Trudivnytsia myronivska’, ‘MIP Assol’ and ‘MIP Dniprianka’, after mustard – ‘Vezha Myronivska’, after sunflower – ‘MIP Fortuna’, after corn – ‘MIP Fortuna’ and ‘Podolianka’. In terms of sowing dates, the least variation in yield was found after the predecessors green manure, mustard and corn varieties ‘MIP Vyshyvanka’, ‘Balada Myronivska’, ‘MIP Kniazhna’, ‘Estafeta Myronivska’. Using the GGE biplot, it was found that close to the ‘ideal environment’ for the realization of the yield level of most genotypes was the second sowing date after greenmanure fallow predecessor. For different sowing dates and predecessors, on average for three years, the optimal combination of the level of yield and stability was noted for the varieties ‘Trudivnytsia Myronivska’, ‘MIP Vidznaka’, ‘MIP Assol’, ‘Estafeta Myronivska’, ‘MIP Valensiia’.

Conclusions. Thus, the use of different so wing dates after various predecessors is an effective approach to organization of genotype-environmental tests. It makes it possible to identify the genotypes which are specifically adapted to certain conditions (predecessors and sowing dates) and genotypes with a relatively high level of stability when sowing after various predecessors and on different dates. This approach can be used both at the final stage of breeding to differentiate breeding lines for yield and stability, and in the development of basic elements of technology for growing newly created varieties.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

І. В. Правдзіва, The V. M. Remeslo Myronivka Institute of Wheat, NAAS of Ukraine

Iryna Pravdziva

О. А. Демидов, The V. M. Remeslo Myronivka Institute of Wheat, NAAS of Ukraine

Oleksandr Demydov

В. М. Гудзенко, The V. M. Remeslo Myronivka Institute of Wheat, NAAS of Ukraine

Volodymyr Hudzenko

О. Л. Дергачов, The V. M. Remeslo Myronivka Institute of Wheat, NAAS of Ukraine

Derhachov, O. L.

References

Pena, R. J. (2005). Current and future trends of wheat quality needs. In Wheat production in stressed environments: Proc. of the 7th Int. Wheat Conf. (pp. 411–424). Nov. 27 – Dec. 2, 2005, Mar del Plata, Argentina. doi: 10.1007/1-4020-5497-1_51

Denčić, S., Mladenov, N., & Kobiljski, B. (2011). Effects of genotype and environment on breadmaking quality in wheat. Int. J. Plant Prod., 5(1), 71–82. doi: 10.22069/IJPP.2012.721

Zhemela, H. P., & Kurochka, A. O. (2012). Influence of precursors on elements of yield structure and grain quality of winter wheat depending on varietal properties. Vìsnik PDAA [Bulletin of Poltava State Agrarian Academy], 1, 33–36. [in Ukrainian]

de Andrade, R. A., Riede, C. R., Dos Santos, S. M. B., Destro, D., & Batista, I. C. (2001). Selection for grain yield and quality in segregating generations of wheat. Braz. Arch. Biol. Technol., 44(2), 173–178. doi: 10.1590/S1516-89132001000200010

Gomez-Becerra, H. F., Abugalieva, A., Morgounov, A., Abdullayev, K., Bekenova, L., Yessimbekova, M., … Cakmak, I. (2010). Phenotypic correlations, G×E interactions and broad sense heritability analysis of grain and flour quality characteristics in high latitude spring bread wheats from Kazakhstan and Siberia. Euphytica, 171(1), 23–38. doi: 10.1007/s10681-009-9984-6

Bonfila, D. J., Karnielib, A., Razb, M., Mufradia, I., Asidoa, S., Egozic, H., ... Schmilovitch, Z. (2004). Decision support system for improving wheat grain quality in the Mediterranean area of Israel. Field Crop. Res., 89(1), 153–163. doi: 10.1016/j.fcr.2004.01.017

Nadew, B. B. (2018). Effects of Climatic and Agronomic Factors on Yield and Quality of Bread Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) Seed: A Review on Selected Factors. Adv. Crop Sci. Tech., 6(2), 356–341. doi: 10.4172/2329-8863.1000356

Angus, J. F., Kirkegaard, J. A., Hunt, J. R., Ryan, M. H., Ohlander, L., & Peoples, M. B. (2015). Break crops and rotations for wheat. Crop Pasture Sci., 66(6), 523–552. doi: 10.1071/CP14252

Morgounov, A., Abugalieva, A., & Martynov, S. (2014). Effect of climate change and variety on long-term variation of grain yield and quality in winter wheat in Kazakhstan. Cereal Res. Commun., 42(1), 163–172. doi: 10.1556/CRC.2013.0047

Kulig, B., Lepiarczyk, A., Andrzej, O., & Kołodziejczyka, M. (2010). The effect of tillage system and forecrop on the yield and values of LAI and SPAD indices of spring wheat. Eur. J. Agron., 33(1), 43–51. doi: 10.1016/j.eja.2010.02.005

Babiker, W. A., Abdelmula, A. A., Eldessougi, H. I., & Gasim, S. E. (2017). The effect of location, sowing date and genotype on seed quality traits in bread wheat (Triticum aestivum). Asian J. Plant Sci. Res., 7(3), 24–28.

Senapati, N., Brown, H. E., & Semenov, M. A. (2019). Raising genetic yield potential in high productive countries: Designing wheat ideotypes under climate change. Agric. For. Meteorol., 271, 33–45. doi: 10.1016/j.agrformet.2019.02.025

Prokopenko, O. (Ed). (2020). Crop production of Ukraine 2019. Statystychnyy zbirnyk [Statistical yearbook]. Kyiv: Derzhavna sluzhba statystyky Ukrainy. [in Ukrainian]

Na-Allah, M. S., Muhammad, A., Mohammed, I. U., Bubuche, T. S., Yusif, H., & Tanimu, M. U. (2018). Yield of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) as influenced by planting date and planting methods in the Sudan savanna ecological zone of Nigeria. Int. J. Life. Sci. Scienti. Res., 04(05), 1993–2002. doi: 10.21276/ijlssr.2018.4.5.6

Havryliuk, M. M., & Kalenych, P. Ye. (2017). Response of new varieties of winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) to the impact of environmental factors under the conditions of the Southern Forest-Steppe zone of Ukraine. Plant Var. Stud. Prot., 13(2), 111–118. doi: 10.21498/2518-1017.13.2.2017.105388. [in Ukrainian]

Ulich, O. L. (2014). Effect of sowing time on the realization of productivity potential of modern varieties of soft winter wheat in the context of climate change. Plant Var. Stud. Prot., 4, 58–62. doi: 10.21498/2518-1017.4(25).2014.55899. [in Ukrainian]

Gudzenko, V. N. (2019). Statistical and graphical (GGE biplot) evaluation of the adaptive ability and stability of winter barley breeding lines. Vavilovskii Zhurnal Genetiki i Selekcii [Vavilov J. Gen. Breed.], 23(1), 110–118. doi: 10.18699/VJ19.469. [in Russian]

Bagulho, A. S., Costa, R., Almeida, A. S., Pinheiro, N., Moreira, J., Gomes, C., … Maçãs, B. (2015). Influence of year and sowing date on bread wheat quality under Mediterranean conditions. Emir. J. Food Agric., 27(2), 186–199. doi: 10.9755/ejfa.v27i2.19279

Ergashev, N. Yu., & Khalikov, B. M. (2017). The influence of precursor plants to protein and gluten of fall wheat. Int. J. Sci. Res., 6(12), 862–863. doi: 10.21275/ART20178854

Shakaliy, S. N., Bahan, A. V., & Barat, Yu. M. (2020). The effect of sowing period on yield of yield and quality of winter wheat. Naukovì dopovìdì NUBiP Ukraïni [Scientific reports NULES of Ukraine], 1. doi: 10.31548/dopovidi2020.01.007. [in Ukrainian]

Demydov, O. A., Vologdina, G. B., Zamlila, N. P., & Koliuchyi, V. T. (2016). Productivity of winter wheat depending on growing conditions, Mironìvsʹkij vìsnik [Myronivka Bulletin], 2, 226– 240. doi: 10.21498/2518-7910.0.2016.119576. [in Ukrainian]

Shestakova, E. O., Eroshenko, F. V., Oganyan, L. R., Storchak, I. G., & Bildieva, E. A. (2019). Influence of different agronomic practices on yield and quality of grains of new winter wheat varieties of breeding of North Caucasian federal scientific agricultural center. Agrar. Vestn. Urala [Agrarian Bulletin of the Urals], 10, 23–31. doi: 10.32417/article_5db430aaa70e02.61022516. [in Russian]

Dergachov, O. L. (2010). Sowing terms of winter bread wheat variety-innovations (Triticum aestivum L.) in the conditions of change of climate. Plant Var. Stud. Prot., 1, 33–37. doi: 10.21498/2518-1017.1(11).2010.59376. [in Ukrainian]

Sasani, S., Amiri, R., Sharifi, H. R., & Lotfi, A. (2020). Impact of sowing date on bread wheat kernel quantitative and qualitative traits under Middle East climate conditions. Zemdirbyste-Agriculture, 107(3), 279–286. doi: 10.13080/z-a.2020.107.036

Madhu, U., Begum, M., Salam, A., & Sarkar, S. K. (2018). Influence of sowing date on the growth and yield performance of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) varieties. Arch. Agr. Environ. Sci., 3(1), 89–94. doi: 10.26832/24566632.2018.0301014

Saleem, M., Qureshi, T. M., Yasin Ashraf, M., Mahmood-ul-Hassan, Anwar-ul-Haq, & Mahmood K. (2015). Delayed planting and genotype affect grain protein and yield of wheat. Int. J. Biol. Biotechnol., 12(1), 85–89.

Zhemela, H. P., & Shakaliy, S. M. (2012). Influence of precursors on grain yield and quality of soft winter wheat. Vìsnik PDAA [Bulletin of Poltava State Agrarian Academy], 3, 20–22. doi: 10.31210/visnyk2012.03.03. [in Ukrainian]

Jaskulska, I., Jaskulski, D., Kotwica, K., Wasilewski, P., & Gałęzewski, L. (2013). Effect of tillage simplications on yield and grain quality of winter wheat after different previous crops. Acta Sci. Pol. Agricultura, 12(3), 37–44.

Siroshtan, A. A., & Kavunets, V. P. (Eds.). (2016). Tekhnolohiia vyrobnytstva nasinnia pshenytsi ozymoi [Technology of produc tion of winter wheat seeds]. Kyiv: Komprynt. [in Ukrainian]

Frutos, E., Galindo, M. P., & Leiva, V. (2014). An interactive biplot implementation in R for modeling genotype-by-environment interaction. Stoch. Environ. Res. Risk Assess, 28(7), 1629–1641. doi: 10.1007/s00477-013-0821-z

Yan, W., Hunt, L. A, Sheng, Q., & Szlavnics, Z. (2000). Cultivar evaluation and mega-environment investigation based on GGE biplot. Crop Sci., 40(3), 597–605. doi: 10.2135/cropsci2000.403597x

Wajid, A., Hussain, A., Ahmad, A., Goheer, A. R., Ibrahim, M., & Mussaddique, M. (2004). Effect of sowing date and plant population on biomass, grain yield and yield components of wheat. Int. J. Agricul. Biol., 6(6), 1003–1005.

Madhu, U., Begum, M., Salam, A., & Sarkar, S. K. (2018). Influence of sowing date on the growth and yield performance of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) varieties. Arch. Agr. Environ. Sci., 3(1), 89–94. doi: 10.26832/24566632.2018.0301014

Yan, W., Kang, M. S, Ma, B., Woods, S., & Cornelius, P. L. (2007). GGE biplot vs. AMMI analysis of genotype-by-environment data. Crop Sci., 47(2), 643–655. doi: 10.2135/cropsci2006.06.0374