Breeding of highly productive sugar beet hybrids with improved beet root shape

Authors

  • O. O. Parfeniuk Tobacco Research Station of the National Research Center “Institute of Agriculture of the National Academy of Agricultural Sciences”, Ukraine https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2348-4904
  • S.H. Trush Tobacco Research Station of the National Research Center “Institute of Agriculture of the National Academy of Agricultural Sciences”, Ukraine https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0968-6358

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21498/2518-1017.18.2.2022.265179

Keywords:

source material, multigerm pollinator, heterosis, shape index, yield of root crops, sugar content, sugar yield, sugar output

Abstract

Purpose. Isolation of donors of valuable breeding and genetic traits and the creation of a new source material for the selection of parental components of sugar beet hybrids according to the shape of the root. Evaluation of the productive potential of experimental sugar beet hybrids with improved root shape parameters.

Methods. Field (experiments, phenological observations), laboratory (determination of sugar content), measuring and weighing (determination of crop structure), statistical (mathematical processing of research results).

Results. The results of the evaluation of the basic productivity of parental components of different genetic structure and productivity of experimental sugar beet hybrids with improved root shape are presented. An increase in the yield of root crops, sugar yield and sugar output per unit area in sugar beet hybrids on a cytoplasmic male-sterile (CMS) basis, created using multigerm pollinators with an improved root crop shape (oval-conical), has been established.  Experimental hybrids formed on the basis of first generation of multigerm pollinators of backcross (BC1) prevailed the group standard in root crop yield by 15.2–22.8%, sugar yield and sugar output by 14.4–19.4% and 11.5–17.5%, respectively. The sugar content was below or at the level of the group standard. Similar indicators of hybrids formed on the basis of pollinators of the second generation of backcross (BC2) were 14.0–21.2%, 17.0–23.2% and 17.6–23.9%, respectively. The sugar content was at the level of the group standard. Root shape index indicators were 1.32 and 1.28, respectively. The hybrids formed using the initial multigerm pollinators were characterized by a conical root shape (shape index – 0.61). According to indicators of yield, sugar yield and sugar output per unit area, they were at the level of the group standard.

Conclusions. It was established that the shape of the root crop is an important factor in improving the productive potential of sugar beets in selection for heterosis. The change in the shape of the root crop from conical to oval-conical leads to an increase in the productivity of multigerm pollinators of sugar beets by 8–19% and hybrids created with their participation by 17–23%.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Roik, M. V., & Kornieieva, M. O. (2015). Directions, methods and strategy of development of sugar beet selection. Sugar Beet, 6, 7–9. [In Ukrainian]

De Lucchi, C., Biancardi, E., Skaracis, G., De Biaggi, M., Pavli, O., Ravi, S., & Stevanato, P. (2021). Sugar Beet (Beta vulgaris ssp. vulgaris L.) Improvement with Next-Generation Breeding Technology. In J. M. Al-Khayri, S. M. Jain, & D. V. Johnson (Eds.), Advances in Plant Breeding Strategies: Vegetable Crops. (pp. 305–343). Cham: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-3-030-66965-2_8

Řezbová H., Belová, A., Škubna, O. (2013). Sugar beet production in the European Union and their future trends. Agris on-line Papers in Economics and Informatics, 5(4), 165–178. doi: 10.22004/ag.econ.162299

Adhikari, P., Araya, H., Aruna, G., Balamatti, A., Banerjee, S., Baskaran, P., & Verma, A. (2018). System of crop intensification for more productive, resource-conserving, climate-resilient, and sustainable agriculture: experience with diverse crops in varying agroecologies. International journal of agricultural sustainability, 16(1), 1–28. doi: 10.1080/14735903.2017.1402504

Roik, M. V., & Sinchenko, V. M. (2015). Bioadaptyvna resursooshchadna tekhnolohiia vyroshchuvannia tsukrovykh buriakiv [Bioadaptive resource-saving technology of sugar beet cultivation] (pp. 29–31). Vinnytsia: Nilan LTD [In Ukrainian]

Roik, M. V., Prysiazhniuk, O. I., Kononiuk, N. O., & Kulik, O. H. (2020). Features of formation of productivity of sugar beets hybrids of domestic breeding. Plant Varieties Studying and Protection, 16(3), 277–283. doi: 10.21498/2518-1017.16.3.2020.214929 [in Ukrainian]

Labroo, M. R., Studer, A. J., & Rutkoski, J. E. (2021). Heterosis and Hybrid Crop Breeding: A Multidisciplinary Review. Frontiers in Genetics, 12, Article 643761. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2021.643761

Korneeva, M. O., & Nenka, M. M. (2014). Variability of Combining Abilities of MS (Male Sterility) Lines and Sterility Binders of Sugar Beets as to Sugar Content. In S. D. Varfolomeev (Ed.), Chemical and Biochemical Technology Materials, Processing and Reliability (рр. 321–332). Toronto–New Jersey: Apple Academic Press.

Chernysky, V., & Gumentyk, M. (2020). Innovative principles of selection of valuable genotypes in the system of competitive strain testing. Agrology, 3(4), 219–224. doi: 10.32819/020026

Fasahat, P., Rajabi, A., Rad, J. M., & Derera, J. (2016). Princip­les and utilization of combining ability in plant breeding. Biometrics & Biostatistics International Journal, 4(1), 1–22. doi: 10.15406/bbij.2016.04.00085

Dubchak, O., Andreyeva, L., Vakulenko, P., & Palamarchuk, L. (2021). Creation of new generation sugar beet hybrids. Agrobio­logy, 1, 32–40. doi: 10.33245/2310-9270-2021-163-1-32-40 [In Ukrainian]

Roik, M. V., & Parfeniuk, O. O. (2018). Use of recombinant materials in selection of parent components of sugar beet hybrids in the root shape. Bulletin of Agricultural Science, 12, 52–58. doi: 10.31073/agrovisnyk201812-08 [In Ukrainian]

Lubova, T. N, Islamgulov, D. R., Ismagilov, K. R., Ismagilov, R. R., Mukhametshin, A. M., Alimgafarov, R. R., … Lebedeva, O. Yu. (2018). Economic Efficiency of Sugar Beet Production. Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences, 13(8), 6565–6569. doi: 10.36478/jeasci.2018.6565.6569

Panagos, P., Borrelli, P., & Poesen, J. (2019). Soil loss due to crop harvesting in the European Union: A first estimation of an underrated geomorphic process. Science of The Total Environment, 664, 487–498. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.02.009

Tuğrul K. M., İçöz, E., & Perendeci, N. A. (2012). Determination of soil loss by sugar beet harvesting. Soil and Tillage Research, 123(4), 71–77. doi: 10.1016/j.still.2012.03.012

Galewski, P., & McGrath, J. M. (2020). Genetic diversity among cultivated beets (Beta vulgaris) assessed via population-based whole genome sequences. BMC Genomics, 21, Article 189. doi: 10.1186/s12864-020-6451-1

Frese, L., Desprez, B., & Ziegler, D. (2001). Potential of genetic resources and breeding strategies for base-broadening in Beta. In H. D. Cooper, C. Spillane, & T. Hodgkin (Eds.), Broadening the genetic base of crop production (pp. 295–309). Wallingford, UK: Cabi Publishing. doi: 10.1079/9780851994116.0295

Stevanato, P., Chiodi, C., Broccanello, C., Concheri, G., Biancardi, E., Pavli, O., & Skaracis, G. (2019). Sustainability of the sugar beet crop. Sugar Tech, 21, 703–716. doi: 10.1007/s12355-019-00734-9

Peretiatko, V. G., & Borshkivskyi, I. M. (2002). Selection to improve the shape and size of roots. Sugar Beets, 3, 16–21. [In Ukrainian]

Hoffmann, C. M., & Kenter, C. (2018). Yield Potential of Sugar Beet – Have We Hit the Ceiling? Frontiers in Plant Science, 9, Article 289. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2018.00289

Roik, M. V, & Kornieieva, M. O. (1994). The shape of roots as an important ecological and selection feature of sugar beets. Pidvyshchennia efektyvnosti buriakovoho vyrobnytstva ta problemy ekolohii i vidkhodiv [Increasing the efficiency of beet production and problems of ecology and waste] (рр. 33–34). Kyiv: N.p. [In Ukrainian]

Hoffmann, C. M. (2017). Changes in root morphology with yield level of sugar beet. Sugar Industry, 142(7), 420–425. doi: 10.36961/si18549

Tsialtas, J. T., & Maslaris, N. (2010). Sugar beet root shape and its relation with yield and quality. Sugar Tech, 12(1), 47–52. doi: 10.1007/s12355-010-0009-5

Hassani, M., Heidari, B., Dadkhodaie, A., & Stevanato, P. (2018). Genotype by environment interaction components underlying variations in root, sugar, and white sugar yield in sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.). Euphytica, 214(4), Article 79. doi: 10.1007/s10681-018-2160-0

McGrath, J. M., & Panella, L. (2018). Sugar Beet Breeding. In I. Goldman (Ed.), Plant Breeding Reviews (Vol. 42, pр. 167–218). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons. doi: 10.1002/9781119521358.ch5

Roik, M. V., & Hizbullin, N. G. (Eds.). (2014). Metodyky prove­den­nіa doslidzhen u burіakivnytstvi [Methods of research in beet growing] (рр. 24–345). Kyiv: FOP Korzun D. Yu. [In Ukrainian]

Dospekhov, B. A. (1985). Metodika polevogo opyta (s osnova­mi statisticheskoy obrabotki rezul’tatov issledovaniy) [Methods of field experiment (with the basics of statistical processing of research results)] (5th ed., rev. and enl.). Moscow: Agropromizdat. [In Russian]

Downloads

Published

2022-08-01

How to Cite

Parfeniuk, O. O., & Trush, S. (2022). Breeding of highly productive sugar beet hybrids with improved beet root shape. Plant Varieties Studying and Protection, 18(2), 118–126. https://doi.org/10.21498/2518-1017.18.2.2022.265179

Issue

Vol. 18 No. 2 (2022)

Section

BREEDING AND SEED PRODUCTION

License

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Our journal abides by the CREATIVE COMMONS copyright rights and permissions for open access journals.

Authors, who are published in this journal, agree to the following conditions:

1. The authors reserve the right to authorship of the work and pass the first publication right of this work to the journal under the terms of a Creative Commons Attribution License, which allows others to freely distribute the published research with the obligatory reference to the authors of the original work and the first publication of the work in this journal.

 2. The authors have the right to conclude separate supplement agreements that relate to non-exclusive work distribution in the form in which it has been published by the journal (for example, to upload the work to the online storage of the journal or publish it as part of a monograph), provided that the reference to the first publication of the work in this journal is included.