Creation of a collection fund and study of cultivars of daylilies in the M. M. Gryshko National Botanical Garden of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21498/2518-1017.20.3.2024.311793

Keywords:

hybridisation, ornamental horticulture, assortment

Abstract

Purpose. Analysis and comparative study of daylily cultivars from the collection fund of the M. M. Gryshko National Botanical Garden of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine (NBG), selection of assortment for decorative horticulture and landscaping. Methods. Cultivars from the NBG daylily collection were studied. The cultivars were evaluated in terms of their aesthetic and economic attributes, and were classified according to their coloration and the timing of their flowering. The author of the cultivar, country of origin, year of creation and introduction into the NBG were also identified. The cultivars were also grouped according to these parameters. Results. The NBG daylily collection is the result of 40 years of introduction and 20 years of breeding work with this crop at the NBG. It includes 174 world cultivars, 26 cultivars of Ukrainian breeding and more than 1000 hybrid seedlings. Most of the cultivars (79) were introduced in 2000–2009. The main part of the current structure of the daylily collection consists of cultivars bred in the 1960–1970s. Most of these are hybrids from American breeders: David F. Hall (20 cultivars) and Allen Wild (46 cultivars). A total of 15 new cultivars were developed based on the original collection. These new cultivars feature double flowers, a valuable trait for hybrids in Ukraine. For effective use in ornamental horticulture and landscaping, the cultivars were grouped according to flower colour and flowering time. The yellow­flowered group is the most widely represented. A large number of cultivars with red flowers are inherent in hybrids bred between 1980 and 1999. Cultivars from modern breeding are mostly represented by the purple and pink colour group. Most of the cultivars in the collection are early and medium early. The smallest part is made up of medium­late and late hybrids. Conclusions. The modern daylily collection is representative. The cultivars introduced into the NBG illustrate the main stages of breeding work with the crop and the achievements of breeders from different countries of the world. The collection includes early and medium early, medium, medium late and late flowering cultivars. Varying in colour and flowering time, the collection can be effectively used to extend the flowering period of daylilies by three months (from the second decade of May to the second decade of August) in ornamental gardening in Ukraine and in various landscape compositions.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Griffiths, M. (1994). Index of Garden Plants. Oregon: Timber Press.

Daylily Database. Retrieved from https://daylilydatabase.org/

American Daylily Society. Retrieved from https://daylilies.org/

Blythe, E. K., Pounders, C., Anderson, M., Watts, E., & Watts, B. (2015). Survey of 575 daylily cultivars for severity of daylily rust in a southern Mississippi landscape. HortTechnology, 25(4), 551–564. doi: 10.21273/HORTTECH.25.4.551

Manole, S. (2018). Improvement of daylilies (Hemerocallis L.) in the Republic of Moldova. Lucrări ştiinţifice seria Horticultură, 61(1), 83–90.

Kong, J., & Zhang, Z. (2021). Study on the Development of Hemerocallis Culture and Its Landscape Application. IOP Conf. Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 768(1), Article 012082. doi: 10.1088/1755-­1315/768/1/012082

Zheng, S., Fang, J., Huang, C., Huang, T., Wang, X., Huang, W., … Zhong, X. (2023). Flower Colours and the Public’s Aesthetic Preference of Hemerocallis. Journal of Sichuan Forestry Science and Technology, 44(2), 116–121. doi: 10.12172/202205060001

Zhao, J., Xue, L., Bi, X., & Lei, J. (2017). Compatibility of interspecific hybridization between Hemerocallis liloasphodelus and daylily cultivars. Scientia Horticulturae, 220(16), 267–274. doi: 10.1016/j.scienta.2017.04.014

Podwyszyńska, M., Gabryszewska, E., Dyki, B., Stępowska, A. A., Kowalski, A., & Jasiński, A. (2014). (2015). Phenotypic and genome size changes (variation) in synthetic tetraploids of daylily (Hemerocallis) in relation to their diploid counterparts. Euphytica, 203(1), 1–16. doi: 10.1007/s10681-014-1212-3

Li, S., Ji, F., Hou, F., Shi, Q., Xing, G., Chen, H., Weng, Y., & Kang, X. (2021). Morphological, palynological and molecular assessment of Hemerocallis core collection. Scientia Horticulturae, 285(1–2), Article 110181. doi: 10.1016/j.scienta.2021.110181

Cui, H., Zhang, Y., Shi, X., Gong, F., Xiong, X., Kang, X. P., Xing, G. M., & Li, S. (2019). The numerical classification and gra­ding standards of daylily (Hemerocallis) flower color. PLoS ONE, 14(6), Article e0216460. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0216460

Misiukevičius, E., & Stanys, V. (2022). Induction and analysis of polyploids in daylily (Hemerocallis L.) plants. Zemdirbyste­Agriculture, 109(4), 373–382. doi: 10.13080/z-a.2022.109.048

Misiukevičius, E., Mažeikienė, I., Gossard, J., Starkus, A., & Stanys, V. (2023). Transcriptome Analysis Autotetraploid Hemerocallis Response to Drought Stress. Horticulturae, 11(9), Article 1194. doi: 10.3390/horticulturae9111194

Cai, X., Liu, J., Zhao, F., & Wang, X. (2023). Transcriptome analysis of response strategy in Hemerocallis fulva under drought stress. Genes & Genomics, 45(5), 593–610. doi: 10.1007/s13258-022-01335-9

Chen, S., Zhou, Q., Feng, Y., Dong, Y., Zhang, Z., Wang, Y., & Liu, W. (2024). Responsive mechanism of Hemerocallis citrina Baroni to complex saline­alkali stress revealed by photosynthetic characteristics and antioxidant regulation. Plant Cell Reports, 43(7), Article 176. doi: 10.1007/s00299-024-03261-4

Zhang, L., Zhou, L., Meng, J., Wu, S., Liu, S., Yang, N., Tian, F., & Yu, X. (2023). Comparative transcriptome analysis of the resistance mechanism of Hemerocallis citrina Baroni to Puccinia hemerocallidis infection. Journal of Plant Interactions, 18(1), Article 2260410. doi: 10.1080/17429145.2023.2260410

Mashkovska, S. P. (Eds.). (2015). Catalog of ornamental and herbaceous plants of botanical gardens and arboretums of Ukraine. Kyiv. Retrieved from http://www.nbg.kiev.ua/upload/biblio/katalog.pdf [In Ukrainian]

Shcherbakova, T. (2018). Creation of perspective daylily hybrids (Hemerocallis hybrida hort.) in M. M. Gryshko National Botanical Garden of the NAS of Ukraine. Bulletin of Lviv National Environmental University: Аgronomy, 22(1), 167–174. [In Ukrainian]

Osadchyi, V. I., Kosovets, O. O., & Babichenko, V. M. (Eds.). (2010). Climate of Kyiv. Kyiv: Nika­Tsentr. [In Ukrainian]

Bulakh, P. E. (2010). Theory and methods of forecasting in plant introduction. Kyiv: Naukova Dumka.

Krokhmal, I. I. (2005). Methodology for examination of daylily varieties (Hemerocallis hybrida Hort.) for distinction, homogeneity and stability. In Methodology of examination of varieties of ornamental plants for distinction, homogeneity and stability (pp. 525–541). Kyiv. Retrieved from https://www.sops.gov.ua/uploads/page/Meth_DUS/2023/Method_decors_2023_new_v.2.pdf [In Ukrainian]

State register of plant varieties suitable for dissemination in Ukraine in 2024. (2024). Retrieved from https://minagro.gov.ua/file­storage/reyestr­sortiv­roslin

Downloads

Published

2024-10-23

How to Cite

Shcherbakova, T. O. (2024). Creation of a collection fund and study of cultivars of daylilies in the M. M. Gryshko National Botanical Garden of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine. Plant Varieties Studying and Protection, 20(3), 140–146. https://doi.org/10.21498/2518-1017.20.3.2024.311793

Issue

Section

VARIETY STUDYING AND VARIETY SCIENCE