Decorative properties of cultivars of Liquidambar styraciflua L.

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21498/2518-1017.20.3.2024.311795

Keywords:

liquidambar, cultivars, woody plants, landsca­ping, leaf color, crown habit

Abstract

Purpose. To determine the structure, and color of the leaf, the bark of the branches, the habit of the crown, the linear characteristics of the plants, the features of flowering and fruiting of Liquidambar styraciflua L. and its cultivars. Provide recommendations for their use in landscaping. Methods.

The subjects of the research were cultivars of L. styraciflua, which were found in arboretums, parks, squares, garden centers, nurseries and in green areas throughout Ukraine. The plants were evaluated according to a complex scale of ornamental value of woody plants, which includes four levels of ornamental value of trees and shrubs: very high, high, medium and low. The methods of observation, analysis, comparison, data summarization, photo­fixation and descriptive­taxation method were used. Results. A comprehensive assessment of the decorative effect of L. styraciflua cultivars (‘Worplesdon’, ‘Gum Ball’, ‘Rotundiloba’, ‘Albomarginata Manon’, ‘Oakville Highlight’, ‘Slender Silhouette’, ‘Fastigiatа’, ‘Pasquali’, ‘Stared’, ‘Thea’, ‘Aurea’, ‘Golden Treasure’, ‘Variegata’, ‘Golden Sun’, ‘Stella’, ‘Stella Rossa’) against species plants was carried out. Based on the results of the research, a table was compiled to help landscape architects, nursery and garden center workers, botanists and ecologists, students and staff of forestry and botanical institutions in the selection of plants. Recommendations are given for the use of L. styraciflua cultivars in landscaping. Conclusions. According to the degree of ornamentality, the vast majo­rity of L. styraciflua cultivars (13) belong to group I (very high, 65–90 points). They are recommended for use in urban and domestic landscaping and for the creation of various landscape objects. Group II (high ornamental value, 51–64 points) contains two cultivars, and group III (moderate ornamental value, 41–50 points) contains only one cultivar.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Rogovskyi, S. V., & Masalskyi, V. P. (2023). The dendroflora of the modern park and its role in the formation of the sacred and memorial landscape. Scientific Bulletin of UNFU, 33(2), 14–24. doi: 10.36930/40330202 [In Ukrainian]

Smilyanets, N. M., & Svitylko, I. M. (2021). Species composition and distribution of the genus Liquidambar L. (Altingiaceae) in Ukraine. Journal of Native and Alien Plant Studies, 1, 274–277. doi: 10.37555/2707-3114.1.2021.247728 [In Ukrainian]

Ickert­Bond, S., & Wen, J. (2013). A taxonomic synopsis of Al­tingiaceae with nine new combinations. PhytoKeys, 31, 21–61. doi: 10.3897/phytokeys.31.6251

Liquidambar styraciflua L. Plants of the World Online. Retrieved May 15, 2024, from https://powo.science.kew.org/taxon/urn:lsid:ipni.org:names:30008300­2

Liquidambar styraciflua L. World flora. Retrieved August 22, 2024, from https://identify.plantnet.org/k­world­flora/species/Liquidambar%20styraciflua%20L./data

Li, J., & Donoghue, M. J. (1999). More molecular evidence for interspecific relationships in Liquidambar (Hamamelidaceae). Rhodora, 101(905), 87–91. Retrieved from https://www.jstor.org/stable/23313333

Kokhno, M. A., Parkhomenko, L. I., Zarubenko, A. U., Vakhnovska, N. G., Gorelov, O. M., Klymenko, S. V., ... Kharchyshyn, V. T. (2002). Dendroflora of Ukraine. Wild and cultivated trees and bushes. Angiosperms (Vol. 1). M. A. Kokhno (Ed.). Кyiv: Fitoso­tsiotsentr. [In Ukrainian]

Ouyang, X. L., Yi, S., Yuan Lu, H., Mei Wu, S., & Qiong Zhao, H. (2016). Liquidambar formosana Hance: A Mini­review of Chemical Constituents and Pharmacology. European Journal of Medicinal Plants, 17(1), 1–11. doi: 10.9734/EJMP/2016/29440

Öztürk, M., Çelik, A., Güvensen, A., & Hamzaoğlu, E. (2008). Eco­logy of tertiary relict endemic Liquidambar orientalis Mill. fo­rests. Forest Ecology and Management, 256(4), 510–518. doi: 10.1016/j.foreco.2008.01.027

Carinanos, P., & Marinangeli, F. (2021). An updated proposal of the Potential Allergenicity of 150 ornamental Trees and shrubs in Mediterranean Cities. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 63, Article e127218. doi: 10.1016/j.ufug.2021.127218

Mancarz, G. F. F., Laba, L. C., da Silva, E. C. P., Prado, M. R. M., de Souza, L. M., de Souza, D., ... Mello, R. G. (2019). Liqui­dambar styraciflua L.: a new potential source for therapeutic uses. Journal of Pharmaceutical and Biomedical Analysis, 174, 422–431. doi: 10.1016/j.jpba.2019.06.003

Pozzobon, R. G., Rutckeviski, R., Carlotto, J., Schneider, V. S., Cordeiro, L. M. C., Mancarz, G. F. F., ... Smiderle, F. R. (2023). Chemical evaluation of Liquidambar styraciflua L. ruits extracts and their potential as anticancer drugs. Molecules, 28(1), Artic­le e360. doi: 10.3390/molecules28010360

Shi, S., Huang, Y., Zhong, Y., Du, Y., Zhang, Q., Chang, H., & Boufford, D. E. (2001). Phylogeny of the Altingiaceae based on cpDNA matK, PY­IGS and nrDNA ITS sequences. Plant Systema­tics and Evolution, 230(1/2), 13–24. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/23644170 DOI 10.1007/s006060170002

Ashby, W. C., Kolar, C. A., Hendricks, T. R., & Phares, R. E. (1979). Effects of shaking and shading on growth of three hardwood species. Forest Science, 25(2), 212–216. doi: 10.1093/forest-science/25.2.212

Santamour, F. S., & McArdle, A. J. (1984). Cultivar checklist for Liquidambar and Liriodendron. Journal of Arboriculture, 10(11), 309–312. doi: 10.48044/jauf.1984.067

Lebeda, A. P. (Ed). (2009). Catalog of medicinal plants of bota­nical gardens and arboretums of Ukraine. Kyiv: Akademperiodika. [In Ukrainian]

Popovych, S. Yu. (Ed). (2019). Protected dendrosozoflora of the zone of broad­leaved forests of Ukraine. Kyiv: FOP Yamchynskyi O. V. [In Ukrainian]

Kokhno, M. A., & Kuznietsov, S. I. (2005). Methodical recommendations for the selection of trees and shrubs for introduction in Ukraine. Kyiv: Fitosotsiotsentr. [In Ukrainian]

Kolesnichenko, O. M., Smilianets, N. M., Shumyk, M. I., Zarubenko, O. L., Rubtsova, O. L., Kazanska, N. A., ... Sydorenko, I. O. (2007). Catalog of a promising assortment of trees. Kyiv: Fitosotsiotsentr. [In Ukrainian]

Kuznietsov, S. I., Pushkar, V. V., & Levon, F. M. (2013). Assortment of trees, bushes and vines for landscaping in Ukraine. Kyiv: Komprint. [In Ukrainian]

Vlasenko, A. (2016). Evaluation of decorativeness of rare arboreal plants ex situ of the Steppe of Ukraine. Lesia Ukrainka Eastern European National University Scientific Bulletin. Series: Biological Sciences, 7, 27–35.

Liquidambar styraciflua L. International Dendrology Society. Retrieved August 16, 2024, from https://treesandshrubsonline.org/articles/liquidambar/liquidambar­styraciflua

Svitylko, I., & Smilyanets, N. (2024). Historical aspect of Liqui­dambar L. research: periodization and perspectives. Biota. Human. Technology, 1, 73–80. doi: 10.58407/bht.1.24.7

Smilyanets, N., Vakulenko, T., & Svitylko, I. (2024). Morphological Structure of Infructescence, Fruits, and Seeds of Some Species of the Genus Liquidambar L. in Species Identification. Agrobiodiversity for Improving Nutrition, Health and Life Quality, 8(1). doi: 10.15414/ainhlq.2024.0012

Published

2024-10-23

How to Cite

Svitylko, I. M. (2024). Decorative properties of cultivars of Liquidambar styraciflua L . Plant Varieties Studying and Protection, 20(3), 147–152. https://doi.org/10.21498/2518-1017.20.3.2024.311795

Issue

Section

VARIETY STUDYING AND VARIETY SCIENCE