Productivity of some varieties of basket willow during the third three-year growing cycle

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21498/2518-1017.21.3.2025.339317

Keywords:

bioenergy, plantation, willow, variety, biomass, cultivation technologies, yield

Abstract

Purpose. To establish biometric indicators of the productivity of energy plantations of basket willow biomass after the third three-year cultivation cycle on leached chernozems in the Right-Bank Forest-Steppe, under different planting schemes and nitrogen fertiliser application rates. Methods. In the spring of 2015, plantings of the ‘Tora’ and ‘Ternopilska’ varieties were established in two rows on the experimental field of the Institute of Bioenergy Crops and Sugar Beet of the NAAS (IBCSB). The planting density of cuttings was 12, 15 or 18 thousand per hectare (ha), with a row-to-row distance of 0.75 m and a row-to-row distance of 1.50–2.50 m. Ammonium nitrate (34.5% nitrogen) was applied at rates of 100 or 200 kg per ha in spring, before the start of the second and third three-year cycles. Fertilisers were not used on part of the area (control variant). The third growing cycle lasted from March 2022 to November 2024. The number of shoots, their average height and diameter, and the yield of three-year energy biomass were determined. Results. During the first three-year growing cycle (2015–2017) without the use of fertilisers, yields ranged from 25.1 to 34.7 t/ha for ‘Tora’ and from 16.0 to 27.9 t/ha for ‘Ternopilska’. During the second cycle, these figures increased to 65.3 t/ha (‘Tora’) and 55.6 t/ha (‘Ternopilska’). Applying 100 or 200 kg/ha of ammonium nitrate increased yields to 68.1 or 74.1 t/ha (‘Tora’) and 59.3 or 64.9 t/ha (‘Ternopilska’) respectively. Studies conducted during the third growing cycle revealed a significant impact of the planting scheme on the density of energy plantations. With a row spacing of 1.50 m, the number of ‘Tora’ shoots was 121.2–178.1 thousand/ha; with a row spacing of 2.50 m, it was 63.1–134.8 thousand/ha. For the ‘Ternopil’ willow, these figures were 59.6–191.4 thousand shoots/ha and 55.8–149.8 thousand shoots/ha, respectively. The same dependence was observed in terms of yield. For the ‘Tora’ variety, the yield was 43.1–54.3 t/ha at a row spacing of 1.50 m, and 36.8–50.8 t/ha at 2.50 m. For the ‘Ternopilska’ variety, the yield was 37.5–49.3 t/ha and 28.8–39.2 t/ha respectively. The lowest yields were observed for 'Tora' (36.8–48.2 t/ha) and ‘Ternopilska’ (28.8–42.1 t/ha) in the variant without the use of fertilisers. These increased to 38.2–50.2 t/ha (‘Tora’) and 30.5–45.3 t/ha (‘Ternopilska’) when 100 kg/ha of ammonium nitrate (N35) was applied to the soil. Doubling the rate to N70 contributed to an increase in dry biomass yield to 42.6–54.3 t/ha for ‘Tora’ and 33.6–47.4 t/ha for ‘Ternopilska’. Conclusions. The highest biometric indicators of plants and energy biomass productivity (54.3 t/ha) during the third three-year cycle were observed in the ‘Tora’ variety at a distance of 1.5 m between rows, a planting density of 15,000 cuttings/ha, and the application of 200 kg/ha of ammonium nitrate (N35). The maximum productivity of ‘Ternopilska’ willow plantations (49.3 t/ha) was recorded using the same cultivation technology and planting density of 12,000 cuttings/ha. In general, the analyzed indicators after the third cycle were lower than those after the second cycle.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

On Energy Efficiency: Law of Ukraine of October 21, 2021 No. 1818-IX. https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/1818-20#Text [In Ukrainian]

Sinchenko, V. M. (Ed.). (2023). Energy willow: technology of cultivation and use. TVORY. [In Ukrainian]

Humentyk, M. Ya. (Ed.). (2024). Technology of growing bioenergy crops. Komprynt. [In Ukrainian]

Нordienko, M. I., Fuchylo, Ya. D., & Goychuk, A. F. (2002). Shrub willows of the plain part of Ukraine. IAE UAAN. [In Ukrainian]

Fuchylo, Ya. D., Zelinskyi, B. V., Ivaniuk, I. D., & Zelinska, L. H. (2023). Growing energy willow plantations on marginal lands of Kyiv Polissia. NOVOhrad. [In Ukrainian]

Matyka, M., & Radzikowski, P. (2020). Productivity and biometric characteristics of 11 varieties of willow cultivated on marginal soil. Agriculture, 10(12), Article 616. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture10120616

Shevchuk, R. V., Rovna, H. F., Fuchylo, Y. D., & Zelinsky, B. V. (2021). Formation of productivity of willow energy plantations at different levels of soil fertility under conditions of Western Polissia. Scientific Papers of the Institute of Bioenergy Crops and Sugar Beet, 27, 123–130. https://doi.org/10.47414/np.27.2019.211177 [In Ukrainian]

Lys, N. M., Tkachuk, N. L., & Ivanyuk, R. S. (2018). Research of influence of growing technology elements on biometrical indexes of energywillowin the western region. Podilian Bulletin: Agriculture, Engineering, Economics, 29, 33–39. [In Ukrainian]

Gnap, I. V. (2019). Introduction of energy willow varieties and improvement of their cultivation technology in Western Polissia (Candidate dissertation, Institute of Bioenergy Crops and Sugar Beet of the NAAS of Ukraine). uacademic.info. https://uacademic.info/ua/document/0419U003652

Vokalchuk, B. M. (2021). Productivity of energy plantations of willow during the second cycle of cultivation (Doctoral dissertation, Institute of Bioenergy Crops and Sugar Beet of the NAAS of Ukraine). uacademic.info. https://uacademic.info/en/document/0822U100133

Rewald, B., Kunze, M. E., & Godbold, D. L. (2016). NH₄: NO₃ nutrition influence on biomass productivity and root respiration of poplar and willow clones. GCB Bioenergy, 8(1), 51–58. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcbb.12224

Dimitriou, I., & Aronsson, P. (2011). Wastewater and sewage sludge application to willows and poplars grown in lysimeters – Plant response and treatment efficiency. Biomass and Bioenergy, 35(1), 161–170. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2010.08.019

Jerbi, A., Kalwahali-Muissa, M., Krygier, R., Johnston, C., Blank, M., Sarrazin, M., Barnabé, S., Laur, J., Labrecque, M., Brereton, N. J. B., & Pitre, F. E. (2023). Comparative wood anatomy, composition and saccharification yields of wastewater irrigated willow cultivars at three plantations in Canada and Northern Ireland. Biomass and Bioenergy, 170, Article 106683. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2022.106683

Mohsin, M., Kaipiainen, E., Salam, M. M. A., Evstishenkov, N., Nawrot, N., Villa, A., Wojciechowska, E., Kuittinen, S., & Pappinen, A. (2021). Biomass Production and Removal of Nitrogen and Phosphorus from Processed Municipal Wastewater by Salix schwerinii: A Field Trial. Water, 13(16), Article 2298. https://doi.org/10.3390/w13162298

Prouzova, N., Kubatova, P., Mercl, F., Szakova, J., Najmanova, J., & Tlustos, P. (2024). Biomass yield and metal phytoextraction efficiency of Salix and Populus clones harvested at different rotation lengths in the field experiment. Chemical and Biological Technologies in Agriculture, 11, Article 78. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40538-024-00600-1

Sticha, V., Nuhlicek, O., Bubenik, J., Weger, J., Macků, J., Vanicka, H., & Bažant, V. (2021). Evapotranspiration-tool for seasoning wood of hybrid poplar (Populus maximowiczii A.Henry × Populus nigra L. ‘Max 4-5’) and Salix × smithiana Willd. (Salix caprea L. and S. viminalis L.). Industrial Crops and Products, 162, Article 113265. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2021.113265

Borz, A., Papandrea, S., Zoli, M., Bacenetti, J., & Proto, A. R. (2025). Willow short rotation coppice. Energy and environmental assessment. Cleaner Environmental Systems, 16, Article 100249. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cesys.2024.100249

Mulyana, B., Vityi, A. & Polgár, A. (2025). Life cycle assessment of bioenergy production from short-rotation coppice plantation in Hungary. Journal of Forest Science, 71(5), 237–249. https://doi.org/10.17221/10/2025-JFS

Santucci, S., Eisenbies, M., & Volk, T. (2024). Yield and survival of 19 cultivars of willow (Salix spp.) biomass crops over eight rotations. Forests, 15(11), Article 2041. https://doi.org/10.3390/f15112041

Caslin, B., Finnan, J., & McCracken, A. (Eds). (2012). Willow Varietal Identification Guide. Teagasc. https://teagasc.ie/wp-content/uploads/media/website/publications/2012/Willow_Identification_Guide_2012.pdf

Sinchenko, V. M. (Ed.). (2018). Methodology of research of energy plantations of willows and poplars. Komprynt. [In Ukrainian]

Sinchenko, V. M., Fuchylo, Ya. D., & Melnychuk, H. A. (2018). Physiological bases of biomass accumulation of willow energy under the conditions of the Central Forest-Steppe. Advanced Agritechnologies, 6. https://doi.org/10.21498/na.6.2018.165308 [In Ukrainian]

Fuchylo, Ya. D., Sinchenko, V. M., Vokalchuk, B. M., & Ivaniuk, I. D. (2022). Productivity of energy plantations of willow during the second three-year growing cycle. NOVOhrad. [In Ukrainian]

Published

2025-09-25

How to Cite

Zelinska, L. H., & Fuchylo, Y. D. (2025). Productivity of some varieties of basket willow during the third three-year growing cycle. Plant Varieties Studying and Protection, 21(3), 145–153. https://doi.org/10.21498/2518-1017.21.3.2025.339317

Issue

Section

PLANT PRODUCTION