Sugar beets combinability analyzes throghut two cycles of recurrent breeding
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21498/2518-1017.2(19).2013.58574Keywords:
hybrids, lines, recurrent breeding, synthetic, yield, sugar content, sugar beets, genetic interaction typesAbstract
Yield and sugar content genetic analyzes for hybrids developed engaging pollinating lines of the first and the second inbred generations throughout two cycles of recurrent breeding has underpinned the determination of regularities for combinability expression in crossing components and the change of their gene interaction types. This unveiled the lack of correlation between the parents descriptions as selected from groups that displayed contrast combining of productivity components and the lines combinability derived thereof. This provided a ground for correcting the breeding technology of the development of MS hybrids through the exclusion of individual polarization as phenotype based breeding method with replacing this by the assessment of economical value of the topcrossing components. The genetic value was determined for pollinator lines of І1 first hybrid generation by productivity components derived from multiple seed populations by Ulad breeding. 7 economically valuable lines were derived from U752 population by yield and 17 by sugar content, whereas 6 and 10 limes were derived from КМ2, respectively . This provided a ground for the development of synthetic varieties that displayed yield and sugar content characteristics improved, respectively, by 9,4 and 2,4% (U752 initial population ) and by 4,4 and 8,3% ( КМ2 initial population) compared to group standard. The structure of genetic variability of MS hybrids productivity as developed engaging І2 .first and second inbred generation. In the genotype variation of characteristics of hybrids derived from І1 pollinators of recurrent breeding first cycle the additive effects of both parental forms prevailed, and as regards the hybrids developed engaging І2 pollinators of the second cycle of recurrent breeding non-additive effects of the components interaction prevailed. In the second cycle of recurrent breeding 7 І2 lines valuable for combining were singled out, which had high general combinability by yield, and 8 were singled out by sugar content. 5 lines were singled out: U752/5/7, U752/84/3, КМ2/33/4, КМ2/34/7, КМ2/75/4, which combined high general combinability by yield and sugar content at once. Heterosis effect of hybrid combinations was subject to total fusion of additive and non-additive effects of the genes controlling quantitative characteristics of the productivity. The best hybrids yield engaging І2, pollinator lines selected out of U752 and КМ2 multi-seed populations ranged within 104...117,3%, sugar content – 102,4...106,0%, while that of synthetic varieties – 113,4 and 103,6% (U752) and 106,7 and 109,3% (КМ2), respectively, against the group standard.Downloads
References
Корнєєва, М.О. Селекційно-генетичне покращення цукрових буряків за технологічною якістю коренеплодів / М.О. Корнєєва, Я.А Мельник, М.Б. Мацук, М.М. Ненька [та інші] // Методичні рекомендації. – К.: ПоліграфКонсалтинг, 2013. – 24 с.
Hallauer, A. Chance in genetic variance for seven plant and ear traits after four ceclts of reciprocal recurrent selection for yild in maize./ Hallauer A. – Iowa Sta/J/ Sci.,1971. – 45,4. – P. 23–29.
Волгин, В.В. Повышение комбинационной способности по сахаристости и массе корнеплодов диплоидных популяций и линий сахарной свеклы в процессе одного цикла рекуррентного отбора / В.В. Волгин, И.Я. Балков, В.А. Логвинов, Л.А. Джигирис. // Сельскохозяйственная биология. – 1992. – No 3. – С. 95–100.
Методика исследований по сахарной свекле. – К.:ВНИС,1986. – 292 с.
Методические рекомендации по применению математических методов для анализа экспериментальных данных по изучению комбинационной способности. – Харьков, 1980. – С. 21–30.
Адаменко, Д. С. Оцінка комбінаційної здатності вихідних популяцій Верхняцької ДСС / Д. С. Адаменко // Цукрові буряки. – 2004. – No 6. – С. 14–15.
Тарутина, Л.А. Взаимодействие генов при гетерозисе /Л.А.Тарутина, Л.В. Хотылева. – Мн.: Наука и техника, 1990. – 176 с.
Драгавцев, В.А. Феногенетический анализ изменчивости в растительных популяциях / В. А. Драгавцев // Вестник АН Каз. ССР, 1983. – No 10. – С. 33–42.
Полонецкая, Л.М. Анализ варианс компонентов урожайности у линий 1 и 2 циклов от сортов Глория Янецкого и ВИР 1094 / Л.М. Полонецкая // Генетика продуктивности сельскохозяйственных культур. – Мн.: Наука и техника, 1978. – С.146–150.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2016 Plant varieties studying and protection
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Our journal abides by the CREATIVE COMMONS copyright rights and permissions for open access journals.
Authors, who are published in this journal, agree to the following conditions:
1. The authors reserve the right to authorship of the work and pass the first publication right of this work to the journal under the terms of a Creative Commons Attribution License, which allows others to freely distribute the published research with the obligatory reference to the authors of the original work and the first publication of the work in this journal.
2. The authors have the right to conclude separate supplement agreements that relate to non-exclusive work distribution in the form in which it has been published by the journal (for example, to upload the work to the online storage of the journal or publish it as part of a monograph), provided that the reference to the first publication of the work in this journal is included.