До питання впорядкування українських назв рослин деяких таксонів підтриби Malinae Reveal (повідомлення 6)

В. М. Меженський

doi:10.21498/2518-1017.1(30).2016.61699

Authors

В. М. Меженський National University of Life and Environmental Sciences of Ukraine, Ukraine

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21498/2518-1017.1(30).2016.61699

Keywords:

Cydonia, Chaenomeles, Pseudocydonia, Mespilus, Eriobotrya, Amelanchier, Cotoneaster, Sorbus s.l., nothogenera, nomenclature

Abstract

Purpose. To analyse the Ukrainian nomenclature of subtribe Malinae representatives and improve terminological system of the Ukrainian names of a species and a generic levels and names of fruit crops. Results. There is a confusion in the Ukrainian names of plants of Cydonia-Chaenomeles–Pseudocydonia, Mespilus–Eriobotrya, Amelanchier–Cotoneaster. Considering the division of Sorbus s.l. on separate genera Sorbus s.str., Aria, Cormus, Chamaemespilus, Torminalis and availability of numerous hybrids with their involvement, the Ukrainian names for both taxa and nothotaxa of species and generic levels are offered, principles of their choice are also considered. Formation of the Ukrainian generic names on the basis of specific epithets leads to undesirable tautonomy. Aspects of derussification of the Ukrainian professional terminology are discussed. Conclusions. Ukrainian scientific generic and nothogeneric plant names for subtribe Malinae are transliterated/transcripted, borrowed as a calque of latin names or have their own origin, consisting of one or two words. The choice of the best variants of generic and species names from a number of possible ones has a temporal component and largely depends on experts who apply them and basic principles of choice. It is necessary to improve the modern Ukrainian plant nomenclature on a national basis involving the transformed Latin scientific names for introduced species and hybrids.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

В. М. Меженський, National University of Life and Environmental Sciences of Ukraine

V. Ì. Mezhenskyj

References

1. Mezhenskyj, V. M. (2015). Do pytannia vporiadkuvannia ukrainskykh nazv roslyn. Povidomlennia 5. Nazvy zerniatkovykh kultur [On streamlining the Ukrainian names of plants. Information 5. Species names for pome fruit crops]. Plant Varieties Studying and Protection, 3–4, 4–11 [in Ukrainian].

Mezhenskyj, V. M., Mezhenska, L. O., Melnychuk, M. D., & Yakubenko, B. Ye. (2012) Netradytsiini plodovi kultury (rekomendatsii z selektsii ta vyroshchuvannia sadyvnoho materialu) [Rare Fruit Crops: recommendations on breeding and propagation]. Kyiv: Phytosociocentr [in Ukrainian].

Slovnyk botanichnoi nomenklatury (Proiekt) [Dictionary of botanical nomenclature (Project)] (1928). Kyiv: Derzhavne vydavnytstvo Ukrainy [in Ukrainian].

Mezhenskyj, V. N. (2004). Khenomeles [Japanese Quince]. Moscow: AST; Donetsk: Stalker [in Russian].

Mezhenskyj, V. N. (2005). Aiva. Pironia. Tzydolus. Pirotzidonia [Quince. Pyronia. Cydolus. Pyrocydonia]. Moscow: AST; Donetsk: Stalker [in Russian].

Mezhenskyj, V. N. (1988) Prodolzhaem diskussiyu [We continue the discussion]. Sadovodstvo i vinogradarstvo Moldavii [Horticulture and Winegrowing in Moldova], 7, 46–47 [in Russian].

Kobiv, Yu. (2004). Slovnyk ukrainskykh naukovykh i narodnykh nazv sudynnykh roslyn [Dictionary of Ukrainian scientific and popular vascular plant names]. Kyiv: Naukova dumka [in Ukrainian].

Buriachok, A. A. (1973). Leksyka suchasnoi ukrainskoi movy z pohliadu yii pokhodzhennia [Vocabulary of modern Ukrainian language in terms of its origin]. In I. K. Bilodid (Ed.) Suchasna ukrainska literaturna mova. Leksyka i frazeolohiia. Knyha 4 [Modern Ukrainian literary language. Vocabulary and phraseology. Book 4]. (pp. 101–150). Kyiv: Naukova dumka [in Ukrainian].

Dobrochaieva, D. M. (1954). Rid 405. Aiva – Cydonia Mill. Rid 406. Khenomeles – Chaenomeles Lindl. Rid 407. Hrusha – Pyrus L. Rid 408. Yablunia – Malus Mill. Rid 409. Horobyna – Sorbus L. Rid. 410. Irha – Amelanchier Medik. Rid 411. Mushmula – Mespilus L. [Genus 405. Quince – Cydonia Mill. Genus 406. Japanese Quince – Chaenomeles Lindl. Genus 407. Pear – Pyrus L. Genus 408. Apple – Malus Mill. Genus 409. Rowan – Sorbus L. Genus. 410. Service-berry – Amelanchier Medik. Genus 411. Mespil – Mespilus L.]. In: Flora URSR [Flora USSR] (pp. 28–49). Kyiv: Vud-vo AN URSR [in Ukrainian].

Zyman, S. N. (1987). Rîd 7. Ayva (Aiva) – Cydonia Mill. Rîd 8. Khenomeles (Khenomeles) – Chaenomeles Lindl. Rîd 9. Grusha (Hrusha) – Pyrus L. Rîd 10. Yablonya (Yablunia) – Malus Mill. Rod 11. Ryabina (Horobyna) – Sorbus L. Rod 12. Yaponskaya mushmula (Yaponska mushmula) – Eriobotrya Lindl. Rîd 15. Mushmula (Mushmula) – Mespilus L. [Genus 7. Quince – Cydonia Mill. Genus 8. Japanese Quince – Chaenomeles Lindl. Genus 9. Pear – Pyrus L. Genus 10. Apple – Malus Mill. Genus 11. Rowan – Sorbus L. Genus 12. Eriobotrya – Eriobotrya Lindl. Genus 15. Mespil – Mespilus L]. In Opredelitel vysshykn rastenii Ukrainy [Field Guide to higher plants of Ukraine]. (pp.158–160). Kiev: Naukova dumka [in Russian].

Zyman, S. M., Didukh, D. M., Hrodzinskyi, D. M., Fedoronchuk, M. M., & Bulakh, O. V. (2008). Trymovnyi slovnyk nazv sudynnykh roslyn flory Ukrainy [Trilingual dictionary of names of vascular plants of the flora of Ukraine]. Kyiv: Phytosociocentr [in Ukrainian].

Klymenko, S. V. (2005). Rid – Chaenomeles Lindl. – Khenomeles, abo yaponska aiva [Genus – Chaenomeles Lindl. – Japanese quince]. In Dendroflora Ukrainy. Dykorosli y kultyvovani dereva y kushchi. Pokrytonasinni. Ch. II. [Dendroflora of Ukraine. Wild and cultivated trees and shrubs. Angiosperms. Part II] (pp. 214 –218). Kyiv: Phytosociocentr [in Ukrainian].

Seneta, W., & Dolatowski, J. (2000). Dendrologia. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN.

Tzvelev, N. N. (2001). Rod 32. Ayvochka – Chaenomeles Lindl. [Genus 32. Japanese quince – Chaenomeles Lindl.]. Flora Vostochnoy Evropy [Flora of Eastern Europe] (pp. 550–552). St. Petersburg: Mir i semya; Izdatelstvo St. Petersburg gos. khim.- farm. akademii [in Russian].

Weber, C. (1964). The genus Chaenomeles (Rosaceae). J. Arnold Arbor., 45(2), 161–205; 45(3), 302–345.

Potter, D., Eriksson, T., Evans, R. C., Oh, S., Smedmark, J. E. E., Morgan, D. R., Kerr, M., Robertson, K. R., Arsenault, M., Dickinson, T. A., & Campbell, C. S. (2007). Phylogeny and classification of Rosaceae. Pl. Syst. Evol., 266, 5–43.

Lo, E. Y. Y., & Donoghue, M. J. (2012). Expanded phylogenetic and dating analyses of the apples and their relatives (Pyreae, Rosaceae). Mol. Phylogen. Evol., 63, 230–243. doi: 10.1016/j.ympev.2011.10.005.

Etymolohichnyi slovnyk ukrainskoi movy [Etimological Dictionary of the Ukrainian language] (1982–2012) (1–7 vols.). Kyiv: Naukova dumka [in Ukrainian].

Lo, E. Y. Y., Stefanović, S., & Dickinson, T. A. (2007). Molecular reappraisal of relationships between Crataegus and Mespilus (Rosaceae, Pyreae) – two genera or one? Syst. Bot., 325(3), 596–616.

Talent, N., Eckenwalder, J. E, Lo, E. Y. Y., Christensen, K. I. & Dickinson, T. A. (2008). Proposal to conserve the name Crataegus against Mespilus (Rosaceae). Taxon, 57(3), 1007–1008.

Brummitt, R. K. (2011). Report of the Nomenclature Committee for Vascular Plants: 62. Taxon, 60(1), 226–232.

Barrie, F. R. (2011). Report of the General Committee: 11. Taxon, 60(4), 1211–1214.

Robertson, K. R., Phipps, J. B., Rohrer, J. R., & Smith, P. G. (1991). A synopsis of genera in Maloideae (Rosaceae). Syst. Bot., 16, 376–394.

Campbell, C. S., Evans, R. C., Morgan, D. R., Dickinson, T. A., & Arsenault, M. P. (2007). Phylogeny of subtribe Pyrinae (formerly the Maloideae, Rosaceae): Limited resolution of a complex evolutionary history. Pl. Syst. Evol., 266, 119–145.

Melnichenko, N. V. (1999). Modifikatsionnaya izmenchivost i formovoe raznoobrazie ryabiny krymskoy v usloviyakh Lesostepi Ukrainy [Modification variability and form diversity of service tree in the Crimean Steppe of Ukraine]. Introduktsia roslyn [Plant Introduction], 3–4, 139–141 [in Russian].

Phipps, J. B., Robertson, K. R., Smith, P. G., & Rohrer, J. R. (1990). A checklist of the subfamily Maloideae (Rosaceae). Can. J. Bot., 68, 2209–2269.

Sabadosh, I. V. (1996). Linhvistychni kryterii suchasnoi haluzevoi terminolohii (na materiali ukrainskoi botanichnoi nomenklatury) [Linguistic criteria of modern sectoral terminology (based on Ukrainian Botanical Nomenclature)]. In Ukrainskyi pravopys i naukova terminolohiia: Istoriia, kontseptsii ta sohodennia: pratsi sesii, konferentsii, sympoziumiv, kruhlykh stoliv NTSH [Ukrainian spelling and scientific terminology: history, concepts and nowdays: proc. of sessions, conferences, symposia, round tables of Schevchenko Scientific Society in Lviv], (Vol. 7, pp. 115–121). Lviv: N.p. [in Ukrainian].