Formation of spring rape yield depending on fractional composition of seed material

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21498/2518-1017.3(32).2016.75988

Keywords:

spring rape, fraction, quality, density, leaf surface area, photosynthetic productivity

Abstract

Purpose. To study the influence of fractional composition of seed material on productive properties of spring rape seeds of the ‘Magnat’ variety and ‘MVM’ (‘Gladiator’) variety sample.

Methods. Field investigations, laboratory tests, statistical analysis.

Results. During 2013–2014, the influence of sown seeds of different size fractions (up to 2,5 g; 2,6–3,5 g; 3,6 g and more) on the indices of productivity of spring rape varie­ties was studied. It was found that over the years of study field germination of sown fractions of seeds in ‘Magnat’ variety averaged 83.5%, in ‘MSM’ variety sample – 86.7%. During the periods of seedling emergence and harvesting, the density of spring rape crops varied depending on relevant fraction of sown seeds. In the ‘Magnat’ variety, photosynthetic potential of crops ranged from 1.1 to 1.3 million m2/ha, in ‘MSM’ variety sample – from 1.2 to 1.6 million m2/ha. Depending on the seed fractions applied, ‘Magnat’ variety crops during the gro­wing season accumulated organic biomass from 2.05 to 2.36 g/m2

per day, ‘MSM’ sample variety – from 1.83 to 2.10 g/m2 per day.

Conclusions. It was established that different fractions of spring rape seeds sown in the Northern Forest-Steppe zone of Ukraine affected the indices of germinating energy and laboratory germination, crop density formation, leaf surface area and intensity of photosynthesis process (crop photosynthetic potential, net photosynthesis performance). The highest indices of productivity and yield in the ‘Magnat’ variety was ensured by large-seeded fraction (3,6 g and more), in the ‘MVM’ (‘Gladia­tor’) sample variety – by small-seeded fraction (up to 2,5 g).

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

П. С. Вишнівський, NSC “Institute of Agriculture NAAS”

Vyshnivskyi, P. S.

І. М. Катеринчук, NSC “Institute of Agriculture NAAS”

Katerynchuk, I. N.

References

Kozlenko, O. M. (2011). Produktyvnist yarykh oliinykh kultur zalezhno vid elementiv tekhnolohii vyroshchuvannia v Pravoberezhnomu Lisostepu Ukrainy [Performance of spring oilseed crops depending on growing technology elements in the Right-Bank Forest-Steppe zone of Ukraine] (Extended Abstract of Cand. Agric. Sci. Diss.). National University of Life and Environmental Sciences of Ukraine, Kyiv, Ukraine. [in Ukrainian]

Strona, I. G. (1966). Obshchee semenovedenie polevykh kul’tur [Ge­ne­ral seed studies of field crops]. Moscow: Kolos. [in Russian]

Moroz, V. M. (2006). Systema pervynnoho vysokoiakisnoho nasinnytstva ripaku [Primary system of high-quality rapeseed breeding]. Kyiv: EKMO. [in Ukrainian]

Firsova, M. K., & Popova, E. P. (1981). Otsenka kachestva zerna i semyan [Evaluation of the quality of grain and seeds]. Moscow: Kolos. [in Russian] 5. Haro, V. Ye., Danylova, O. I., & Karpiuk, Yu. M. (2009). Consumer properties of rapeseed. Naukovi pratsi Odeskoi natsionalnoi akademii kharchovykh tekhnolohii [Proceedings of Odessa National Academy of Food Technologies], 36(1), 22–26. [in Ukrainian]

Vyshnivskyi, P. S. Hubenko, L. V., Remez, H. H., & Lepekha, V. H. (2009). The impact of fertilizers and sowing methods on the productivity of spring rape. Zbirnyk naukovykh prats NNTs “Instytut zemlerobstva UAAN” [Proceedings of the NSC “Institute of Agriculture of UAAS”], 1–2, 99–104. [in Ukrainian]

Saiko, V. F., Kaminskyi, V. F., Vyshnivskyi, P. S., Hubenko, L. V., Korniichuk, M. S., Buslaieva, N. H., & Shliakhturov, D. S. (2011). Osoblyvosti provedennia doslidzhen z khrestotsvitymy oliinymy kulturamy [Features of studying cruciferous oilseeds]. P. S. Vyshnivskyi (ed.). Kyiv: N.p. [in Ukrainian]

Published

2016-07-28

How to Cite

Вишнівський, П. С., & Катеринчук, І. М. (2016). Formation of spring rape yield depending on fractional composition of seed material. Plant Varieties Studying and Protection, (3(32), 73–77. https://doi.org/10.21498/2518-1017.3(32).2016.75988

Issue

Section

PLANT PRODUCTION