Evaluation of productivi­ty of different varieties of soryz (Sorghum orysoidum)





rice grain sorghum, crop capacity, protein content, starch content, bioethanol, grain moisture


Aim. To establish the features of productivity formation (yield, protein and gluten content and estimated yield of bioethanol) of different varieties of soryz.

Methods. Experimental studies were conducted during 2019–2021 at the Experimental Field of the Institute of Bioenergy Crops and Sugar Beets of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine (Ksaverivka 2, Bila Tserkva District, Kyiv Region). Yields were determined by direct combining in sections, protein and starch content by infrared spectroscopy, and possible bioethanol yield by starch content.

Results. On average, over the years of research, the highest yields were observed in the cultivar ‘Fakel’ – 10.93 t/ha, the lowest – in ‘Helios’ and ‘Saliut’ – 7.97 and 8.82 t/ha, respectively. The yield of other varieties was 9.38–9.82 t/ha, while the stability index, depending on the cultivar, varied from 0.77 to 0.90. The hi­ghest protein content in seeds was found in the variety ‘Samaran 6’ (14.0%), the lowest – in ‘Oktan’ (12.7%) and ‘Merkurii’ (12.4%). In other varieties of soryz this figure ranged from 13.1 to 13.9%. The stability index of the protein content was high – 0.91–0.97. It was found that the cultivation of soryz varieties ‘Evropa’, ‘Tytan’, ‘Samaran 6’ and ‘Fakel’ allows to obtain the highest estimated yield of bioethanol – 4027–4630 kg/ha. The lowest indicator was in the variety ‘Helios’ – 2846 kg/ha. For other varieties, this figure was at the level of 3378–3861 kg/ha. It should be noted that the grain of all soryz varieties must be dried after harvest, as its humidity, even in more favorable weather conditions is 16.2–21.4%.

Conclusions. Soryz productivity varies greatly depending on the variety and weather conditions. All varieties provided high yields – 7.97–10.93 t/ha. For the production of food grain with a protein content of 13.1–13.8%, it is recommended to use varieties of ‘Kvarts’, ‘Helios’, ‘Saliut’ and ‘Odeskyi 302’. For the production of food grain (protein share 13.9–14.2%) and obtaining a high yield of bioethanol (3478–5265 l/ha) it is necessary to use varieties ‘Evropa’, ‘Tytan’, ‘Samaran 6’ and ‘Fakel’.


Download data is not yet available.


Mundia, C. W., Secchi, S., Akamani, K., & Wang, G. (2019). A regional comparison of factors affecting global sorghum production: the case of North America, Asia and Africa’s Sahel. Sustainability, 11(7), Article 2135. doi: 10.3390/su11072135

FAOSTAT. (2019). Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Rome: FAOSTAT.

Liubych, V. V. (2021). Modern achievements of cereal production. Bulletin of Uman National University of Horticulture, 1, 78–82. doi: 10.31395/2310-0478-2021-1-71-76 [In Ukrainian]

Liubych, V. V., Voitovska, V. I., Kryzhanivskyi, V. H., & Tretiakova, S. O. (2021). Formation of the biochemical component of flour from grain of different hybrids of rice. Bulletin of Uman National University of Horticulture, 1, 66–70. doi: 10.31395/2310-0478-2021-1-66-70 [In Ukrainian]

Davis, K. F., Chhatre, A., Rao, N. D., Singh, D., & De Fries, R. (2019). Sensitivity of grain yields to historical climate variability in India. Environmental Research Letters, 14(6), Article 064013. doi: 10.1088/1748-9326/ab22db

Abdelhalim, T. S., Abdelhalim, N. S., Kamal, N. M., Mohamed, E. E., & Hassan, A. B. (2021). Exploiting the potential of Sudanese sorghum landraces in biofortification: physicochemical quality of grain sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L. Moench) landraces. Food Chemistry, 3370, Article 127604. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2020.127604

Eggen, M., Ozdogan, M., Zaitchik, B., Ademe, D., Fotlz, J., & Sima­ne, B. (2019). Vulnerability of sorghum production to extreme, sub-seasonal weather under climate change. Environmental Research Letters, 14, Article 045005. doi: 10.1088/1748-9326/aafe19

Ocheing, G., Nguyi, K., Wamalwa, L. N., Manyasa, E., Muchira, N., & Nyamongo, D. (2020). Novel sources of drought tolerance from landraces and wild sorghum relatives. Crop Science, 61(1), 104–118. doi: 10.1002/csc2.20300

Patil, J. V., Reddy, P. S., Prabhakar, U. A. V., Sunil, G., and Ganapathy, K. N. (2014). History of post-rainy season sorghum research in India and strategies for breaking the yield plateau. Indian Journal of Genetics and Plant Breeding, 74(3), 271–285. doi: 10.5958/0975-6906.2014.00845.1

Zhou, Y., Huang, J., Li, Z., Wu, Y., Zhang, J., & Zhang, Y. (2022). Yield and Quality in Main and Ratoon Crops of Grain Sorghum Under Different Nitrogen Rates and Planting Densities. Frontiers in Plant Science, 12, Article 778663. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2021.778663

Alderfasi, A. A., Selim, M. M., & Alhammad, B. A. (2016). Evaluation of plant densities and various irrigation regimes of sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L.) under low water supply. Journal of Water Resource and Protection, 8(01), 1–11. doi: 10.4236/jwarp.2016.81001

Al-Taweel, S. K., Najm, E. S., Cheyed, S. H., Cheyed, S. H., & Snaa, Q. (2020). Response of sorghum varieties to the ratoon cultivation 1-Growth characteristics. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 870, Article 012030. doi: 10.1088/1757-899X/870/1/012030

Afzal, M., Ahmad, A., & Ahmad, A. H. (2012). Effect of nitrogen on growth and yield of sorghum forage (Sorghum Bicolor (L.) Moench Cv.) under three cuttings system. Cercetari Agronomice in Moldova, 45(4), 57–64. doi: 10.2478/v10298-012-0065-y

Cai, H., Tabien, R. E., Xu, D., Harper, C. L., Samford, J., Yang, Y., You, A., Samonte, S. O. P. B., Holgate, L., & Jiao, C. (2019). Grain quality and yield of rice in the main and ratoon harvests in the southern U.S. Journal of Agricultural Science, 11(15), 1–15. doi: 10.5539/jas.v11n15p1

Pekarcik, A. J., & Jacobson, A. L. (2021). Evaluating Sugarcane Aphid, Melanaphis sacchari (Hemiptera: Aphididae), Population Dynamics, Feeding Injury, and Grain Yield Among Commercial Sorghum Varieties in Alabama. Journal of Economic Entomo­logy, 114(2), 757–768. doi: 10.1093/jee/toab013

Oyier, M. O., Owuoche, J. O., Oyoo, M. E., Cheruiyot, E., Mulian­ga, B., & Rono, J. (2017). Effect of Harvesting Stage on Sweet Sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L.) Genotypes in Western Kenya. Scientific World Journal, Article 8249532. doi: 10.1155/2017/8249532

Poperechnyi, A. M., Potapov, V. O., & Korniichuk, V. H. (2012). Modeliuvannia protsesiv ta obladnannia kharchovykh vyrobnytstv [Modeling of processes and equipment of food production]. Kyiv: Tsentr uchbovoi literatury. [In Ukrainian]



How to Cite

Voitovska, V. I., Storozhyk, L. I., Liubych, V. V., & Yalanskyi, O. V. (2022). Evaluation of productivi­ty of different varieties of soryz (Sorghum orysoidum). Plant Varieties Studying and Protection, 18(1), 50–56. https://doi.org/10.21498/2518-1017.18.1.2022.257587




Most read articles by the same author(s)