Screening of promising potato hybrids by drought tolerance indices

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21498/2518-1017.19.1.2023.277769

Keywords:

potato, breeding samples, indices, yield, drought, sources of drought resistance

Abstract

Purpose. To evaluate promising potato hybrids for productivity and resistance to drought under water deficit conditions and to identify genotypes with a high level of adapta­bility to abiotic environmental factors.

Methods. During 2021–2022, 57 potato genotypes of different ripeness groups were studied in the fields of breeding crop rotation of the breeding laboratory of the Polissia Research Department of the Institute for Potato Research NAAS of Ukraine. Genera­l­ly accepted methods of selective statistical analysis were used.

Results. The research results revealed that in a dry year, the average potato yield loss for all maturity groups was 15.3 t/ha or 66 % compared to the indicators of a wet year. A high total percentage of drought-resistant and moderately drought-resistant hybrids was distinguished in the mid-season group. In total 16 breeding samples out of 54 studied ones under the condition of sufficient moisture produced the highest yield (in the range of 24.4–35.9 t/ha). During dry periods, 21 samples had high productivity (7.8–19.2 t/ha). The following hybrids showed an advantage over the average (Ŷ) for 8–9 evaluated drought tolerance indices: ‘P.15.56-10’, ‘P.17.21/43’, P.19.53/6’, ‘P.17.30-3’, ‘P.17.1-4’, ‘P.18.51/3’, ‘P.17.19-21’, ‘P.17.18/9’, ‘P.17.4/13’ ‘P.17.43/1’, P.17.44-1’, ‘P.17.38/16’, ‘P.17.8-28’, ‘P.17.13/7’ and ‘P.17.38-56’.

Conclusions. According to the results of the research, hybrids with high productivity and response to stress were identified. Thus, 5 samples formed high productivity under optimal conditions and were resistant to drought; 5 samples were flexi­b­le hybrids; 8 hybrids were demanding to moisture supply during the process of crop formation. The sources of drought resistance were 5 hybrids out of 54 studied ones. An average positive correlation (r = 0.528) between yields under diffe­rent moisture conditions was established.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

FAO. (2022). FAO Statistical Databases. Rome: FAO. Retrieved from www.fao.org/faostat/en

Raza, A., Razzaq, A., Mehmood, S. S., Zou, X., Zhang, X., Lv, Y., & Xu, J. (2019). Impact of Climate Change on Crops Adaptation and Strategies to Tackle Its Outcome: A Review. Plants, 8(2), 34–62. doi: 10.3390/plants8020034

Griggs, D. J., & Noguer, M. (2002). Climate change 2001: The scientific basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Third Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Weather, 57, 267–269. doi: 10.1256/004316502320517344

Rykaczewska, K. (2015). The Effect of High Temperature Occurring in Subsequent Stages of Plant Development on Potato Yield and Tuber Physiological Defects. American Journal of Potato Research, 92(3), 339–349. doi: 10.1007/s12230-015-9436-x

Zarzynˆska, K., Boguszewska-Manˆkowska, D., & Nosalewicz, A. (2017). Differences in size and architecture of the potato cultivars root system and their tolerance to drought stress. Plant, Soil and Environment, 63(4), 159–164. doi: 10.17221/4/2017-PSE

Joshi, M., Fogelman, E., Belausov, E., & Ginzberg, I. (2016). Potato root system development and factors that determine its architecture. Journal of Plant Physiology, 205, 113–123. doi: 10.1016/j.jplph.2016.08.014

Obidiegwu, J. E., Bryan, G. J., Jones, H. G., & Prashar, A. (2015). Coping with drought: stress and adaptive response in potato and perspective for improvement. Frontiers in Plant Science, 6, 542–564. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2015.00542

Chang, D. C., Jin, Y. I., Nam, J. H., Cheon, C. G., Cho, J. H., Kim, S. J., & Yu, H. S. (2018). Early Drought Effect on Canopy Development and Tuber Growth of Potato Cultivars with Different Maturities. Field Crops Research, 215, 156–162. doi: 10.1016/j.fcr.2017.10.008

Aliche, E. B., Oortwijn, M., Theeuwen, T. P., Bachem, C. W., Visser, R. G., & van der Linden, C. G. (2018). Drought Response in Field Grown Potatoes and the Interactions between Canopy Growth and Yield. Agricultural Water Management, 206, 20–30. doi: 10.1016/j.agwat.2018.04.013

Bota, J., Medrano, H., & Flexas, J. (2004). Is Photosynthesis Limited by Decreased Rubisco Activity and RuBP Content under Progressive Water Stress? New Phytologist, 162(3), 671–681. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2004.01056.x

Iwama, K., & Yamaguchi, J. (2006). Abiotic stresses. In J. Gopal, & S. M. P. Khurana (Eds.), Handbook of Potato Production, Improvement and Post-Harvest Managemen (pp. 231–278). New York, NY: Food Product Press.

Nasir, M. W., & Toth, Z. (2022). Effect of Drought Stress on Potato Production: A Review. Agronomy, 12(3), 635–656. doi: 10.3390/agronomy12030635

Tardieu, F. (2012). Any trait or trait-related allele can confer drought tolerance: just design the right drought scenario. Journal of Experimental Botany, 63(1), 25–31. doi: 10.1093/jxb/err269

Millet, E. J., Welcker, C., Kruijer, W., Negro, S., Coupel-Ledru, A., Nicolas, S.D., ... Tardieu, F. (2016). Genome-wide analysis of yield in Europe: allelic effects vary with drought and heat scenarios. Plant Physiology, 172(2), 749–764. doi: 10.1104/pp.16.00621

El-Hendawy, S. E., Hassan, W. M., Al-Suhaibani, N. A., & Schmidhalter, U. (2017). Spectral assessment of drought tolerance indices and grain yield in advanced spring wheat lines grown under full and limited water irrigation. Agricultural Water Mana­gement, 182, 1–12. doi: 10.1016/j.agwat.2016.12.003

Bouslama, M., & Schapaugh, W. T. (1984). Stress tolerance in soybean. Part 1: evaluation of three screening techniques for heat and drought tolerance. Crop Science, 24(5), 933–937. doi: 10.2135/cropsci1984.0011183X002400050026x

Nikneshan, P., Tadayyon, A., & Javanmard, M. (2019). Evaluating drought tolerance of castor ecotypes in the center of Iran. Heliyon, 5(4), 1403–1415. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e01403

Lin, C. S., Binns, M. R., & Lefkovitch, L. P. (1986). Stability ana­lysis: where do we stand? Crop Science, 26(5), 894–900. doi: 10.2135/cropsci1986.0011183X002600050012x

Fernandez, G. C. J. (1992). Effective selection criteria for assessing plant stress tolerance. In C. G. Kuo (Ed.), Proceedings of the International Symposium on Adaptation Food Crops to Temperature and Water Stress (pp. 257–270). Shanhua, Taiwan: AVRDC. doi: 10.22001/wvc.72511

Lan, J. (1998). Comparison of evaluating methods for agronomic drought resistance in crops. Acta Agriculturae Boreali-occidentalis Sinica, 7, 85–87.

Martínez, I., Muñoz, M., Acuña, I., & Uribe, M. (2021). Evalua­ting the Drought Tolerance of Seven Potato Varieties on Volca­nic Ash Soils in a Medium-Term Trial. Frontiers in Plant Science, 12, 16–29. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2021.693060

Moosavi, S. S., Yazdi Samadi, B., Naghavi, M. R, Zali, A. A, Dash­ti, H., & Pourshahbazi, A. (2008). Introduction of new indices to identify relative drought tolerance and resistance in wheat genotypes. Desert (Biaban), 12(2), 165–178. doi: 10.22059/jdesert.2008.27115

Roostaei, M., Jafarzadeh, J., Roohi, E., Nazary, H., Rajabi, R., Haghparast, R., … Mirfatah, S. M. M. (2021). Grouping patterns of rainfed winter wheat test locations and the role of climatic variables. Euphytica, 217(9), Article 183. doi: 10.1007/s10681-021-02915-8

Downloads

Published

2023-03-30

How to Cite

Pysarenko, N. V., Sydorchuk, V. I., Zakharchuk, N. A., & Hordiienko, V. V. (2023). Screening of promising potato hybrids by drought tolerance indices. Plant Varieties Studying and Protection, 19(1), 35–43. https://doi.org/10.21498/2518-1017.19.1.2023.277769

Issue

Vol. 19 No. 1 (2023)

Section

BREEDING AND SEED PRODUCTION

License

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Our journal abides by the CREATIVE COMMONS copyright rights and permissions for open access journals.

Authors, who are published in this journal, agree to the following conditions:

1. The authors reserve the right to authorship of the work and pass the first publication right of this work to the journal under the terms of a Creative Commons Attribution License, which allows others to freely distribute the published research with the obligatory reference to the authors of the original work and the first publication of the work in this journal.

 2. The authors have the right to conclude separate supplement agreements that relate to non-exclusive work distribution in the form in which it has been published by the journal (for example, to upload the work to the online storage of the journal or publish it as part of a monograph), provided that the reference to the first publication of the work in this journal is included.