Grain yield and protein content in different ripening varieties of soft winter wheat using various types and doses of fertilizers

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21498/2518-1017.19.1.2023.277770

Keywords:

variety, productivity, weather conditions, fertilizer system, protein collection

Abstract

Purpose. To study of yield formation and protein content in the grain of different ripening varieties of soft winter wheat under the condition of using various types and doses of fertilizers.

Methods. Field and laboratory (determination of protein content), calculation (collection of protein), mathematical and statistical.

Results. It was found that different fertilization systems reliably increased the grain yield of soft winter wheat. The use of N75 increased this indicator by 1.2 times and N150 by 1.4 times in the varieties studied, compared with the no-fertilizer variant. Yield with incomplete return of phosphorus-potassium fertilizer was only 2–3% lower than with complete mineral fertilizer. With the nitrogen-phosphorus and nitrogen-potassium fertilization systems, the yield was 5–7% higher than with the nitrogen system. At the same time, this indicator was 6% lower than in the full mineral fertilizer version of the trial. The use of 75 kg/ha nitrogen fertilizer per year increased the protein content to 13.5%, or by 10% compared to the control. In the double dose nitrogen fertilizer variant, the protein content increased to 14.2% or by 15%. The use of nitrogen fertilizers with phosphorus-potassium only contributed 2–4% to the increase of this indicator. Cultivation of winter wheat under the condition of application of N75 increased the collection of protein up to 724 kg/ha or by 33%, and with a double dose of nitrogen fertilizer – up to 848 kg/ha or by 55% compared to the option without fertilizer. In the N75P30K40 variant, protein yield increased by 10% compared to the nitrogen system. The application of a complete mineral fertilizer (N150P60K40) increased this indicator by 12%.

Conclusions. It was found that the use of N75P30K40 increased the grain yield of soft winter wheat by up to 5.9 t/ha, or 7%, compared to the option where only 75 kg/ha of nitrogen fertilizer was applied. Yield development in soft winter wheat varies considerably from variety to variety. For example, this indicator was 35% higher in the ‘KWS Emil’ variety than in the ‘Prino’ line. In addition, the grain yield of both varieties is reliably influenced by the weather conditions during the growing season. The protein content of soft winter wheat varies considerably depending on the variety and the weather conditions. When growing soft winter wheat varieties, the protein content can vary by 12.8–15.1%. Weather conditions during the growing season can change this indicator by 13.1–14.7%. The protein content index in the grain of the ‘Prino’ line is significantly higher than that of the ‘KWS Emil’ variety. According to the protein yield per hectare indicator, the ‘KWS Emil’ variety (896 kg/ha) has a significant advantage over the ‘Prino’ line (774 kg/ha).

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Liubych, V. V. (2021). Quality of bread from flour of different spelt wheat varieties. Scientific Papers of the Institute of Bio­energy Crops and Sugar Beet, 29, 78–88. doi: 10.47414/np.29.2021.244429 [In Ukrainian]

Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. (2023). Retrieved from http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/QC

Hospodarenko, H. M., Liubych, V. V., Burliai, O. L., & Prytuliak, R. M. (2022). Agrochemical properties of podzolic chernozem under different doses of nitrogen fertilizers and their combination with other types of mineral fertilizers. Agrarian Innovations, 14, 18–22. doi: 10.32848/agrar.innov.2022.14.3 [In Ukrainian]

Chen, H., Deng, A., Zhang, W., Li, W., Qi, Y., Yang, T., … Chen, F. (2018). Long-term inorganic plus organic fertilization increa­ses yield and yield stability of winter wheat. The Crop Journal, 6(6), 589–599. doi: 10.1016/j.cj.2018.06.002

Hospodarenko, H. M., Liubych, V. V., & Prytuliak, R. M. (2022). Effectiveness of different types and doses of fertilizers in field crop rotation. Taurida Scientific Herald, 127, 27–32. doi: 10.32851/2226-0099.2022.127.3 [In Ukrainian]

Li, C., Hao, Y., Xue, Y., Wang, Y., & Dang, T. (2020). Effects of long-term fertilization on soil microbial biomass carbon, nitrogen, and phosphorus in the farmland of the Loess Plateau, China. Journal of Agro-Environment Science, 39(8), 1783–1791. doi: 10.11654/jaes.2020-0240

Bezuglova, O. S., Polienko, E. A., Gorovtsov, A. V., Lyhman, V. A., & Pavlov, P. D. (2017). The effect of humic substances on winter wheat yield and fertility of ordinary chernozem. Annals of Agra­rian Science, 15(2), 239–242. doi: 10.1016/j.aasci.2017.05.006

Hospodarenko, G. M., Cherno, O. D., Lubich, V. V., Ryabovol, Y. S., & Kryzhanivsky, V. G. (2020). Yield and baking properties of winter wheat grain at different doses and terms of nitrogen fertilizer application. Bulletin of Poltava State Agrarian Academy, 3, 21–31. doi: 10.31210/visnyk2020.03.02 [In Ukrainian]

Baimuratov, A., Bastaubayeva, S., Arslan, M., & Yeraliyeva, Z. (2021). Effect of fertilizer application on winter wheat productivity under precision agriculture in Kazakhstan. Biodiversitas, 22(3), 1558–1563. doi: 10.13057/biodiv/d220362

Sanadi, U., Math, K. K., Lamani, K. D., & Reddy, U. G. (2023). Qua­lity of Bread Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) as Influenced by Different Nutrient Management Approaches under Northern Transitional Zone of Karnataka. International Journal of Plant & Soil Science, 35(1), 22–33. doi: 10.9734/ijpss/2023/v35i12711

Zhang, R., Yang, Y., Dang, T., Zhu, Y., & Huang, M. (2022). Respon­ses of Wheat Yield under Different Fertilization Treatments to Climate Change Based on a 35-Year In Situ Experiment. Agriculture, 12(9), Article 1498. doi: 10.3390/agriculture12091498

Šimansky, V. (2016). Changes in soil organic matter parameters du­ring the period of 18 years under different soil management practices. Agriculture, 62(4), 149–154. doi: 10.1515/agri-2016-0015

Shehab-Eldeen, M. T., Khedr, R. A., & Genedy, M. S. (2021). Studies on Morphophysiological Traits and their Relationships to Grain Yield and its Components of Six Bread Wheat Genotypes under Four Nitrogen Fertilization Levels. Journal of Plant Production, 12(1), 11–17. doi: 10.21608/jpp.2021.152011

Ruiz, M., Zambrana, E., Fite, R., Sole, A., Tenorio, J. L., & Benavente, E. (2019). Yield and Quality Performance of Traditional and Improved Bread and Durum Wheat Varieties under Two Conservation Tillage Systems. Sustainability, 11(17), Article 4522. doi: 10.3390/su11174522

State Standard of Ukraine 4117:2007. Grain and products of its processing. Determination of quality indicators by the method of infrared spectroscopy. (2007). Kyiv: Derzhspozhyvstandart Ukrainy. [In Ukrainian]

Atique-ur-Rehman, Qamar, R., Altaf, M. M., Alwahibi, M. S., Al-Yahyai, R., & Hussain, M. (2022). Phosphorus and potassium application improves fodder yield and quality of sorghum in Aridisol under diverse climatic conditions. Agriculture, 12(5), Article 593. doi: 10.3390/agriculture12050593

Prysiazhniuk, L. M., Khomenko, T. M., Liashenko, S. O., & Melnyk, S. I. (2022). The growing factors impact the producti­vity of new soft winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) varieties. Plant Varieties Studying and Protection, 18(4), 273–282. doi: 10.21498/2518-1017.18.4.2022.273989 [In Ukrainian]

Holland, J. E., White, P. J., Glendining, M. J., Goulding, K. W. T., & McGrath, S. P. (2019). Yield responses of arable crops to liming – An evaluation of relationships between yields and soil pH from a long-term liming experiment. European Journal of Agronomy, 105, 176–188. doi: 10.1016/j.eja.2019.02.016

Downloads

Published

2023-03-30

How to Cite

Silifonov Т. V. . (2023). Grain yield and protein content in different ripening varieties of soft winter wheat using various types and doses of fertilizers. Plant Varieties Studying and Protection, 19(1), 44–51. https://doi.org/10.21498/2518-1017.19.1.2023.277770

Issue

Section

PLANT PRODUCTION