Significance of sources of valuable traits for cotton breeding




cotton collection, variety, weight of raw cotton, number of open bolls per plant, fiber


Purpose. Select valuable samples from the collection of cotton on the basis of “number of open bolls per plant” and “weight of raw cotton from one boll” for further use in the breeding process when creating new varieties and their impact on productivity.

Methods. During 2002–2019 on the fields of selection crop rotation of the selection department of the Institute of Irrigated Agriculture of the National Academy of Sciences, 282 samples of cotton of different ripeness groups were studied.

Results. Among the stu­died cotton gene pool, in 20.4% of samples, the number of bolls per plant was very small – < 65–75%, in 26.8% – small, in the remaining (52.8%) samples, an average number of open bolls was formed. The analysis of the boll mass indicators showed that 16.0% of the samples had a very small boll (less than 3.0 g), most of the collection – 66.0% had a small boll (3–4 g); average (5.0–6.0 g) – 18.0%. It was revealed that there is the most significant direct relationship between the productivity of samples and the number of open bolls per plant. The equation for the correlation-regression dependence of the productivity of one plant on the number of open bolls per plant is: y = 0.1807x 0.5292; Coefficients: R2 = 0.852; r = 0.923. A direct positive dependence was observed in the samples of UF080000 ‘Pidozers­kyi 4’, UF0800027 ‘Populiatsiia 3’, UF0800241 ‘Populiatsiia 9’, UF0800029 ‘417 U’, UF0800228 ‘3737 U’, UF08000 ‘K 71’, UF0800056 ‘Mariia’, UF0800206 ‘1086/94’. The maximum productivity, from 45.0–49.2 g, was noted in the early matu­ring samples of the collection, compared with varieties that had a long vegetation period and productivity from 33.0 to 43.0 g. The excess over the standard is from 2.5 up to 6.7 g and from 9.5 to 0.5 g/plant, respectively.

Conclusions. For the first time in the conditions of the Southern Steppe, the most significant direct relationship between the producti­vity of genotypes and the number of open bolls per plant was revealed r = 0.923. The maximum productivity from 45.0 to 49.2 g was observed in early maturing samples of the collection. In the course of many years of cotton gene pool research, sources of valuable traits were identified.


Download data is not yet available.


Fominat, M., & Nichmatov, M. M. (2016). Seed production of new varieties of medium-fiber cotton in the conditions of central Tajikistan. Reports of the Tajik Academy of Agricultural Sciences, 3, 4–6. [In Russian]

Shabbir, M. S., & Yaqoob, N. (2019). The impact of technological advancement on total factor productivity of cotton: a comparative analysis between Pakistan and India. Journal of Economic Structures, 8(1), Article 27. doi: 10.1186/s40008-019-0160-4

McCarty, J. C., Cash, L. I., & Jenkins, J. N. (2011). Effects of Within-Row Plant Spacings on Growth, Boll Retention, and Yield of Four Cotton Cultivars. Bulletin (Mississippi Agricultural and Forestry Experiment Station), 1191. Retrieved from

Bridge, R. R., Meredith, W. R., & Chism, J. F. (1973). Influence of Planting Method and Plant Population on Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.). Agronomy Journal, 65(1), 104–109. doi: 10.2134/agronj1973.00021962006500010032x

Hu, L., Pan, X., Wang, X., Hu, Q., Wang, X., Zhang, H., Xue, Q., & Song, M. (2021). Cotton photosynthetic productivity enhancement through uniform row-spacing with optimal plant density in Xinjiang, China. Crop Science, 61(4), 2745–2758. doi: 10.1002/csc2.20535

Guzman, M., Vilain, L., & Rondon, T. (2019). Sowing Density Effects in Cotton Yields and Its Components. Agronomy, 9(7), Article 349. doi: 10.3390/agronomy9070349

Zhang, N., Tian, L., Feng, L., Xu, W., Li, Y., Xing, F., … Wang, F. (2021). Boll characteristics and yield of cotton in relation to the canopy microclimate under varying plant densities in an arid area. PeerJ, 9, Article e12111. doi: 10.7717/peerj.12111

Li, X., Han, Y., Wang, G., Feng, L., Wang, Z., Yang, B., … Li, Y. (2020). Response of cotton fruit growth, intraspecific competition and yield to plant density. European Journal of Agronomy, 114, Article 125991. doi: 10.1016/j.eja.2019.125991

Chapepa, B., Mudada, N., & Mapuranga, R. (2020). The impact of plant density and spatial arrangement on light interception on cotton crop and seed cotton yield: an overview. Journal of Cotton Research, 3(1), Article 18. doi: 10.1186/s42397-020-00059-z

Olmstead, A., & Rhode, P. (2008). Biological Innovation and Productivity Growth in the Antebellum Cotton Economy. National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper No. 14142. Cambridge, MA. doi: 10.3386/w14142

Seyidaliev, N. Ya. (2004). The number of cotton bolls depen­ding on the norms of fertilizers and irrigation regime. In Proceedings of the International Scientific Symposium, AzSHA (pp. 337–340). Ganja. [In Russian]

Bednarz, C. W., Bridges, D. C., & Brown, S. M. (2000). Analysis of Yield Stability across Population Densities. Agronomy Journal, 92(1), 128–135. doi: 10.2134/agronj2000.921128x

Bednarz, C. W., Bridges, D. C., & Brown, S. M. (2000). Boll Retention and Boll Size among Intrasympodial Fruiting Sites in Cotton. Crop Science, 43(1), 195–201. doi: 10.2135/cropsci2003.1950

Himanshu, S. K., Ale, S., Bordovsky, J. P., Kim, J., Samanta, S., Omani, N., & Barnes, E. M. (2021). Assessing the impacts of irrigation termination periods on cotton productivity under strategic deficit irrigation regimes. Scientific Reports, 11(1), Article 20102. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-99472-w

Sadras, V. O. (1997). Interference among Cotton Neighbours after Differential Reproductive Damage. Oecologia, 109(3), 427–432. Retrieved from doi: 10.1007/s004420050102

Khan, A., Najeeb, U., Wang, L., Tan, D. K. Y., Yang, G., Munsif, F., Ali, S., & Hafeez, A. (2017). Planting density and sowing date strongly influence growth and lint yield of cotton crops. Field Crops Research, 209, 129–135. doi: 10.1016/j.fcr.2017.04.019

Zhi, X., Han, Y., Li, Y., Wang, G., Du, W., Li, X., Mao, S., & Feng, L. (2016). Effects of plant density on cotton yield components and quality. Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 15(7), 1469–1479. doi: 10.1016/S2095-3119(15)61174-1

Jenkins, J. N., & McCarty, J. C. (1995). Useful Tools in Mana­ging Cotton Production: End of Season Plant Maps. Bulletin (Mississippi Agricultural and Forestry Experiment Station), 1024.

Parmar, R. S., Rajarathinam, A., Patel, H. K., & Patel, K. V. (2006). Statistical modeling on area, production and productivity of cotton (Gossypium spp.) crop for Ahmedabad Region of Gujarat State. Journal of Pure and Applied Microbiology, 10(1), 751–759.

Stephens, D., Parvin, D. W., & Cooke, F. T. (2000, Janua­ry 4–8). The Impact of Narrow Skip-Row Cotton on Cost Per Pound. Proceedings of the Beltwide Cotton Conferences (Vol. 1, pp. 295–298). San Antonio, TX, USA. Retrieved from

Parvin, D. W., Martin, S. W., & Cooke, F. T. (2003, January 6–10). The Effect of Tillage Systems, Row Spacing, Equipment Size, Soil Group and Variety Type on Yields, Costs and Returns, Mississippi Delta. Proceedings of the Beltwide Cotton Conferences (pp. 450–460). Nashville, TN, USA. Retrieved from

Volkodav, V. V. (Ed.). (2001). Metodyka derzhavnoho sortovyprobuvannia silskohospodarskykh kultur. Vypusk 3 (oliini, tekhnichni, priadylni ta kormovi kultury) [The method of state varie­ty and testing of agricultural crops. Release 3 (olive, technical, spinning and fodder crops)]. Kyiv: Alefa. [In Ukrainian]

Dospekhov, B. A. (1985). Metodika polevogo opyta (s osnovami statisticheskoy obrabotki rezul’tatov issledovaniy) [Methods of field experiment (with the basics of statistical processing of research results)] (5th ed., rev. and enl.). Moscow: Agropromizdat. [In Russian]

Vozhehova, R. A. (Ed.). (2014). Metodyka polovykh i laboratornykh doslidzhen na zroshuvanykh zemliakh [Methods of field and laboratory research on irrigated lands]. Kherson: Hrin D. S. [In Ukrainian]

Lemeshev, N., Atlanov, A., Podol’naya, L., & Korneychuk, V. (1989). Shirokiy unifitsirovannyy klassifikator SEV roda Gossypium L. [Wide unified classifier of the CMEA of the genus Gossypium L.]. Leningrad: VIR. [In Russian]

Vozhegova, R. A., Riabchun, V. K., Borovyk, V. O. (2015). Shyrokyi unifikovanyi klasyfikator-dovidnyk rodu Gossypium hirsutum L. [Wide unified classifier-reference book of the genus Gossypium hirsutum L.]. Kherson: Hrin D. S. [In Ukrainian]



How to Cite

Borovyk, V. O., Vozhehova, R. A., Marchenko, T. Y., Boiarkina, L. V., & Khomenko, T. M. (2022). Significance of sources of valuable traits for cotton breeding. Plant Varieties Studying and Protection, 18(1), 42–49.