Effects of different herbicide treatments on Solidago canadensis L.

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21498/2518-1017.22.1.2026.357585

Keywords:

weed suppression, biomass, shoot density, plant regeneration, invasive species control, chemical plant protection

Abstract

Purpose. The study aimed to evaluate the impact of various herbicide treatments on Solidago canadensis L. and develop recommendations for its long-term management. Methods. Three chemical control schemes were assessed in 2021–2025: Lintur 70 WG (triasulfuron + dicamba), Roundup Max (glyphosate), and Dianate BASF (dicamba). Treatments were applied using a handheld sprayer during the active vegetative growth phase at a temperature of +20–23 °C and relative humidity of 65–70%. The herbicides' effectiveness was evaluated comprehensively by determining the suppression of the above-ground part, the number of viable shoots, and the ability to regenerate. Statistical analysis was performed using ANOVA with the LSD₀.₀₅ criterion in Statistica 13.0 and Microsoft Excel 2019. Results. The results show that all the herbicides tested have a clear suppressive effect on Solidago canadensis L., although their effectiveness varies considerably depending on the active ingredients and how long they remain effective for. Overall, Lintur 70 WG exhibited the greatest effectiveness, providing rapid and progressive suppression of plant growth, reaching 91.8 ± 3.5% by 42 days after treatment, along with the greatest biomass suppression (86.8 ± 2.7%) and the strongest decrease in shoot density (~90% to 3 shoots/m²), indicates the minimal regeneration ability of the plant. Dianate BASF exhibited moderate but less stable control, with final suppression of 79.3 ± 3.5% and biomass suppression of 69.3 ± 2.6%. The reduction in shoot density (~71% to 6 shoots/m²) suggests partial recovery potential of the species after treatment. Roundup Max demonstrated moderately high yet less sustainable performance, reaching 84.7 ± 3.5% suppression and 57.2 ± 2.4% biomass suppression, with the weakest reduction in shoot density (~63% to 9 shoots/m²), indicating the highest regeneration potential among the tested variants. Conclusions. These findings confirm that multicomponent herbicides with different modes of action are the most effective way to sustainably control S. canadensis, as they ensure rapid biomass suppression and minimal regeneration. The study highlights the importance of considering the physiological responses of plants when predicting the duration of herbicide effectiveness against invasive species. These results could inform the development of chemical management strategies for invasive weeds in Ukrainian agroecosystems and natural habitats.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Havryliuk, O., Hovorukha, V., Bida, I., Gladka, G., Tymoshenko, A., Kyrylov, S., Mariychuk, R., & Tashyrev, O. (2023). Anaerobic degradation of the invasive weed Solidago canadensis L. (goldenrod) and copper immobilization by a community of sulfate-reducing and methane-producing bacteria. Plants, 12, Article 198. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants12010198

Yavorska, H., & Vorobets, N. (2025). Evaluation of antifungal activity of “green” Solidago canadensis extracts. The Journal of V. N. Karazin Kharkiv National University. Series Biology, 45, 115–123. https://doi.org/10.26565/2075-5457-2025-45-8

Bakacsy, L., Kardos, L. V., Szepesi, Á., Nagy, K. N., Vasas, A., & Feigl, G. (2024). Investigation of the allelopathic effect of two invasive plant species in rhizotron system. Life, 14(4), Article 475. https://doi.org/10.3390/life14040475

Bang, A., Cuthbert, R. N., Haubrock, P. J., Fernandez, R. D., Moodley, D., Diagne, C., Turbelin, A. J., Renault, D., Dalu, T., & Courchamp, F. (2022). Massive economic costs of biological invasions despite widespread knowledge gaps: A dual setback for India. Biological Invasions, 24(7), 2017–2039. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-022-02780-z

Dakhil, M. A., El-Keblawy, A., El-Sheikh, M. A., Halmy, M. W. A., Ksiksi, T., & Hassan, W. A. (2021). Global invasion risk assessment of Prosopis juliflora at biome level: Does soil matter? Biology, 10(3), Article 203. https://doi.org/10.3390/biology10030203

García-Mozo, H. (2024). Assessment of the diversity, abundance and range of invasive alien plant species in Córdoba, a Mediterranean urban area. Diversity, 16(12), Article 777. https://doi.org/10.3390/d16120777

Khan, A. M., Li, Q., Saqib, Z., Khan, N., Habib, T., Khalid, N., Majeed, M., & Tariq, A. (2022). MaxEnt modelling and impact of climate change on habitat suitability variations of economically important chilgoza pine (Pinus gerardiana Wall.) in South Asia. Forests, 13(5), Article 715. https://doi.org/10.3390/f13050715

Lipińska, H., Lipiński, W., Shuvar, I., Korpita, H., & Shuvar, A. (2023). Invasive species of plants and their threat to biodiversity. Plant and Soil Science, 14(1), 51–66. https://doi.org/10.31548/plant1.2023.51

Nagabhushan Arun, M., Mahender Kumar, R., Sreedevi, B., Padmavathi, G., Revathi, P., Pathak, N., Srinivas, D., & Venkatanna, B. (2023). The rising threat of invasive alien plant species in agriculture. IntechOpen. https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.106742

Rai, P. K., & Singh, J. S. (2020). Invasive alien plant species: Their impact on environment, ecosystem services and human health. Ecological Indicators, 111, Article 106020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2019.106020

Rashid, I., Haq, S. M., Lembrechts, J. J., Khuroo, A. A., Pauchard, A., & Dukes, J. S. (2021). Railways redistribute plant species in mountain landscapes. Journal of Applied Ecology, 58(9), 1967–1980. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.13961

Shuvar, I., Korpita, H., Balkovskyi, V., Shuvar, A., & Kropyvnytskyi, R. (2021). Asclepias syriaca L. is a threat to biodiversity and agriculture of Ukraine. BIO Web of Conferences, 36, Article 07010. https://doi.org/10.1051/bioconf/20213607010

Słowiński, K., Grygierzec, B., Synowiec, A., Tabor, S., & Araniti, F. (2022). Preliminary study of control and biochemical characteristics of giant hogweed (Heracleum sosnowskyi Manden.) treated with microwaves. Agronomy, 12(6), Article 1335. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy12061335

Sužiedelytė Visockienė, J., Tumelienė, E., & Maliene, V. (2020). Identification of Heracleum sosnowskyi-invaded land using earth remote sensing data. Sustainability, 12(3), Article 759. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12030759

Tiwari, S., Mishra, S. N., Kumar, D., Kumar, B., Vaidya, S. N., Ghosh, B. G., Rahaman, S. M., Khatun, M., Garai, S., & Kumar, A. (2022). Modelling the potential risk zone of Lantana camara invasion and response to climate change in eastern India. Ecological Processes, 11(1), Article 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13717-021-00354-w

Zhu, X., Li, W., Shao, H., & Tang, S. (2022). Effects of extracts from various parts of invasive Solidago species on the germination and growth of native grassland plant species. Chemical Biodiversity, 19(10), Article e202200728. https://doi.org/10.1002/cbdv.202200728

Anas, M., Huang, Z. Y., Xiong, H., Imran, M., Yan, M. T., Javed, Q., Ren, G. Q., Qi, S. S., Li, J., Dai, Z. C., & Du, D. L. (2025). Response of invasive Solidago canadensis to foliar application of natural herbicide and glyphosate. Journal of Environmental Management, 394, Article 127522. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2025.127522

Szabó, A.-K., Bálint, J., Molnár, A., Aszalos, S. E., Fora, C. G., Loxdale, H. D., & Balog, A. (2022). Associational susceptibility of crop plants caused by the invasive weed Canadian goldenrod, Solidago canadensis, via local aphid species. Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution, 10, Article 1080599. https://doi.org/10.3389/fevo.2022.1080599

Baranets, M., Bień-Kostycz, P., Turnau, K., Kalaji, H., & White, J. (2025). Mitigation of Solidago canadensis invasion using natural substances and selected endophytes. Research Square. https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-7665103/v1

Poljuha, D., Sladonja, B., Božac, M., Šola, I., Damijanić, D., & Weber, T. (2024). The invasive alien plant Solidago canadensis: Phytochemical composition, ecosystem service potential, and application in bioeconomy. Plants, 13(13), Article 1745. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants13131745

Shuvar, I., Korpita, H., Shuvar, A., Shuvar, B., & Kropyvnytskyi, R. (2021). Invasive plant species and the consequences of its prevalence in biodiversity. BIO Web of Conferences, 31, Article 00024. https://doi.org/10.1051/bioconf/20213100024

Visockienė, J. S., Tumelienė, E., & Maliene, V. (2020). Identification of Heracleum sosnowskyi-invaded land using earth remote sensing data. Sustainability, 12, Article 759. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12030759

Ye, X., Gu, C., Meng, J., & Wu, M. (2025). Differences in the response of invasive Solidago canadensis and native Imperata cylindrica to glyphosate. Plants, 14(17), Article 2640. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants14172640

Downloads

Published

2026-04-20

How to Cite

Korpita, H. M., & Shuvar, I. A. (2026). Effects of different herbicide treatments on Solidago canadensis L. Plant Varieties Studying and Protection, 22(1). https://doi.org/10.21498/2518-1017.22.1.2026.357585

Issue

Section

PLANT PRODUCTION